SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SteveF who wrote (28897)10/15/2012 1:02:16 PM
From: arvitarRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 53574
 
I've always been suspicious about their infinite bank accounts. Then when they team up with the very same promoters who conned them on previous scams, it's either Stockholm Syndrome or a dupe-turned-con.



To: SteveF who wrote (28897)10/15/2012 7:53:58 PM
From: the_big_guyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 53574
 
That is an intriguing possibility. maybe after an investor gets scammed, they befriend one of the pumpers, somehow getting in on the "inside track" on the next pump. i corresponded with the big names privately for years just for a lark. At that time I did not take ihub seriously at all.

I believe i got a tip about JBI from one of them at 1.20. i looked at it and thought it was a maxed out POS. That is when i started posting on it. i was surprised when it went it 7.00. No regrets of course.

so maybe these guys buy into the pump and dump game and join the crew after they lose their shirt, or maybe a good part of their wardrobe. that is why they spend so much time posting, in the hope that they can recoup their losses. Maybe they get in on the ground floor enough to keep them interested.

it is an interesting theory. I have always wondered how the serious pumpers keep their credibility on the board when the people who follow them must lose an awful lot of money. I think it must be a combination of the above, and there always being a fresh supply of sheep for slaughter. Definitely the latter.