Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (514326)	10/17/2012 2:55:56 AM
From: t4texas	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794299

people who make under $250K will go in a big way for no tax on dividends, no tax on capital gains (stocks/mutual funds/bond appreciation), and no tax on interest. that is a point that a huge number of people will go for, and it definitely hits the middle class and under. those over 250K will continue to pay capital gains taxes. i think this is a great tax abatement idea that will appeal to lots of adult voters whether dems or republicans.

To: carranza2 who wrote (514326)	10/17/2012 3:31:14 AM
From: selivanov	Respond to of 794299

Your wife sounds like a pseudointellectual to me! All the pseudos will be voting for Money Printing!

To: carranza2 who wrote (514326)	10/17/2012 11:31:16 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	2 Recommendations Respond to of 794299

I think the "Great Center of American Politics" needs permission to do three things: 1. Officially get tired of The One (without being accused of racism) 2. Examine Mitt Romney to see if he looks like a President 3. Support Mitt Romney The Obama campaign has been all about denying permission for these actions by constant class & race warfare and spending $200 million in negative ads on Mitt Romney. In fact the Obama campaign has been entirely centered on trashing Mitt Romney, to the exclusion of putting forward a plan for a second term. The first debate went a long way towards all three points. The first and second point definitely (when The New Yorker Eastwooded Obama on its cover, that was a palpable paradigm shift) and we saw movement on number three. I don't think the 2nd debate did anything to derail the process.