Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (514379)	10/17/2012 9:09:24 AM
From: carranza2	8 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793587

Exactly. Crowley was horrible, per all accounts. I wonder whether voters will figure out that O! mentioned the video as the cause of the assault numerous times after his Rose Garden speech including, significantly, when he addressed the UN general assembly, and should clearly have known better by then. Talk about lies! It will backfire, however, because those statements will be examined in detail at the third debate, and O! cannot survive the cross-examination. "Tell me, Mr. President, since your statements cannot be reconciled, were you lying at the Rose Garden or were you lying to the UN? And if you were lying at the UN, why did you ask Ms. Rice to lie to the american people for you? Or are you simply inept? Or did you think that, if believed, the video lie wouldn't tarnish your record on terrorism? And why did you get Sec. Clinton to assume responsibility? Doesn't the buck stop at your desk?" Gawd, a litigator's dream faux pas. Candy doesn't know it, but she helped Romney in an enormous way - she set O! up for a really hard time on Monday.