Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (679317)	10/17/2012 10:48:24 AM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1571964

I was impressed with how good Romney is at this.

To: i-node who wrote (679317)	10/17/2012 10:55:18 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1571964

Oh, BS. The damned thing was a tie at worst, and no objective person thinks Obama won by any margin. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You are doing great at stand up. Obama kept pointing out where Mittens was flat out lying in many places. And Romney had no good response. Don't get me wrong, Mittens had a good debate. But Obama was better. And got better as the debate went on. If you take out the Candy Crowley interruption/confusion on Libya, Romney scored a clear win. She was pointing out the actual facts. Granted, your team seems to think reality is just a distraction, but... And no, he didn't score a clear win. Just like Obama isn't tongue-tied without a teleprompter. Or are you going to claim that it actually was all scripted and he was using a teleprompter all along? If this moves the polls at all it will be toward Romney. I suppose anything is possible. It may not be likely, but not impossible.