SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (146226)10/18/2012 4:15:29 PM
From: Woody_Nickels1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224858
 
Yes, and really the fix to Soc. Sec. only becomes burdensome
when it is neglected, and pushed back in time.

There was a great article on Yahoo! a few years back about 5
relatively pain free ways to fix Soc. Security. Things like eliminate
the max. income subject to SS withholding, or raise SS withholding
by 1/2 percent every 7(?) years for the next 28 yrs., or raise the age
for full benes to 70-72 over time. Can't remember them all, but
the longer we wait to address the problem, the more drastic the
fix must be.

Likely, a fix for Medicare is similarly framed. However, healthcare
is much more complicated overall. Doctors think like politicians...
how much money do you make?... Give it to me, or suffer.
We need more doctors to reduce costs, but the egos in the medical
community are as bad as a union, in restricting access to funds
and admissions to med schools.

How Obammy could expand healthcare is beyond me. If the current
program(Medicare) is going bankrupt, how can you replace it with an
even more comprehensive, and obviously more expensive, system?
First you make the current program solvent, then try to find a way
to make healthcare more inclusive.

Obammy NEVER had the experience or intellect to address either of
these programs. Yet, he pretends to be The Only Answer.