To: FJB who wrote (10794 ) 12/1/1997 5:46:00 PM From: Yakov Lurye Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25960
Re: future revenues from consumables. Robert, Gary, Cymeed, Zeev, thanks for responses to my query. Cymeed's spreadsheets illustrate my point: as the base of working DUV expands, recurring revenues become important. They may be ignored for 1997, but not in the 1998-9 models. $250,000/year/system in laser consumables from the AMD article seems real high, but the revenue of $50,000/yr/system - about 10% of the original laser system cost - could be plausible. If we are to believe that 2000 DUV systems will be eventually deployed, this is extra $100m/yr in revenues. I've been looking through the early posts on the thread (amazing - 10000 posts in last 3 months), but did not find much information the subject. In particular, could not find the 30% revenues reference mentioned by Robert. I want to post though a few tidbits that are new to me, and might be of interest for the newcomers. On the qualitative level, they are also useful for adjusting the earnings model: 1) According to one post (1022), convertible debentures must be included in fully diluted EPS calculations. This may be of some importance when CYMER starts reporting fully diluted earnings in 1998. 2) The following excerpt is from a post #1095. The writer worked with CYMI lasers and complained about software, equipment failures, lack of support etc. Sure enough, he was flamed a lot and does not post here anymore: "... Cymer is not interested in service. They want laser sales. That is why they train the customers and give them much more information than any other company I have seen give out. They would like us to fix and change out parts as much as we are able to. We have been receiving a lot of free work and parts as chambers and power supplies have been failing before their lifetimes. .But Cymer will be selling chamber & output coupler optics, and chambers after their warranty ends." The way I read it, the poster was reporting real problems typical for a new equipment line (in this case, 5000 series) early in the life cycle. On-the fly changes (software bug fixes, thyratrons replacement etc) did squeeze the margins last Q. The problems are more or less taken care off now - at least the management did suggest so during the CC. IMO, we may see higher margins after 4Q97. Also, it is understandable that early in the game, CYMER's interest lies in getting customers to commit to their equipment. Selling spare chambers and coupler optics will come later. Hope we'll learn more about the subject. 3). Somewhere in August there was a post that Komatsu is now producing 10 lasers/month. If their current capacity is 120 lasers/year, CYMER has a big lead for 1998 orders. We may learn more after the Semicon in Japan. Regards, Y.