SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (679718)10/18/2012 7:23:12 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1573433
 
Obama's Second Terrorism Cover-Up: Ft. Hood

That last post about the Little Rock terror attack reminds me of Pres. Obama's second terrorism cover-up: the Ft. Hood attack.

The Justice Department still won't call it a terror attack, even though Nidal Hasan was in contact with al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, shouted "Allahu Akbar" in the process, and considers himself a mujahideen in the war against the infidel.

Here's a video about the soldiers attacked that day.

And a website advocating a change in the Army's listing of the terror attack from "workplace violence" to an act of war.

But, of course, that will never happen with this President in charge of the DOD.

Update by SH: If you are on Twitter please follow a wife of one of the injured Ft Hood soldiers. @WWWife:

Autumn Manning, Wife of Soldier wounded at Fort Hood terrorist attack Nov 5th 2009...Never forget 13 dead, 34 wounded. Combat status denied thanks to Obama.



mypetjawa.mu.nu
By Rusty Shackleford, October 18, 2012



To: combjelly who wrote (679718)10/18/2012 7:35:11 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1573433
 
Media's left-turn signal stuck on

torontosun.com
Wednesday, October 17, 2012

What does it tell you when the room set aside for reporters to watch Tuesday night's presidential debate erupted into raucous applause after President Barack Obama made a mockery of Mitt Romney's personal wealth?

What does it tell you when Candy Crowley, CNN's chief Washington correspondent and the debate's moderator, crossed the line and told Romney he was wrong when in fact he was right -- that Obama didn't mention "terrorism" as the reason for the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya until two weeks later?

It tells you the media in the United States, like Crowley, is up to its sanctimonious neck in pro-liberal bias.

If it wasn't for the Washington Times, no one else in that reporters' room likely even noticed their own applause, proving just how steeped they are in their liberal ideologies.

What? We were clapping?

What does it tell you then when Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper prorogues Parliament for legitimate and well-stated reasons and gets viciously attacked in the media, yet Ontario's Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty gets no grief whatsoever for pulling the same stunt, without explanation and without legitimacy?

It tells you the same thing. It tells you Canada's media -- covering both houses of government, and almost regardless of province -- are up to their own sanctimonious necks in pro-liberal bias.

Unlike Harper, McGuinty wasn't trying to dodge an unholy coalition alliance of Liberals, NDPers and Bloc Quebecois forming a government that would bury the country in debt. He was avoiding a motherlode of scandals, contempt charges, and billion-dollar wastes which had run out of excuses and timelines.

So he took the coward's way out.

He turned his tail and ran, using his unexpected resignation as premier as a smoke screen to the prorogation.

This led to the majority of the media in Ontario writing stories of McGuinty's so-called legacy, too many unctuously positive, and let him get away like a bandit with the prorogation of Ontario's government, now dead in the water until at least springtime.

Then, as a followup, what does our media do?

It touts McGuinty as a serious contender for the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada.

It's beyond disgraceful.