Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (680393)	10/23/2012 2:23:25 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575781

What has been debunked is that he waited for two weeks before describing it as terrorism. Granted, he wasn't as forceful as, say, Dubya would have been. But virtually everything was terrorism, especially before an election. According to the CIA, there was conflicting information. Their assessments reflected that for a while. Still, they did regard it as terrorism from the start. What was really in question was the degree of planning. Even so, here is a list. cnn.com Now the thing your little fantasy lacks is what would have been the benefit of a coverup?