Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (680505)	10/23/2012 10:56:18 AM
From: Brumar89	4 Recommendations Respond to of 1586791

Interesting to see liberals making arguments for letting Iran get nuclear weapons.

To: combjelly who wrote (680505)	10/23/2012 10:58:59 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586791

>> Umm, the concept of mutually assured destruction works. Stupid remark. When Reagan was running against Carter, the Left was all about stopping nuclear proliferation, something that had been going on under the "shield" of MAD for decades. Reagan recognize it was idiotic and said so. MAD was the basis for the entire Cold War. You want to go back to that? Reagan ended it by recognizing just how stupid the concept of MAD was. And now you tell us it "works"?

To: combjelly who wrote (680505)	10/23/2012 12:30:04 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586791

CJ, can you tell me why the Obama administration, after claiming they'll talk with Iran without any pre-conditions, has pursued a policy that states a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable? Maybe you can tell Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the concept of mutually assured destruction works, and that it's OK to let Iran have the bomb. Tenchusatsu