Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (146715)	10/23/2012 1:14:33 PM
From: TideGlider	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

You always miss the mark.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (146715)	10/23/2012 1:15:32 PM
From: Carolyn	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224749

That is what Obama should have done in November 2010.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (146715)	10/23/2012 1:15:42 PM
From: longnshort	5 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

KRAUTHAMMER CALLS THE FINAL DEBATE: ‘IT’S UNEQUIVOCAL – ROMNEY WON’ Home - by Cardigan - October 23, 2012 - 07:30 America/New_York - 9 Comments The Blaze During his post-debate analysis on Fox News, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer argued GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney won Monday night’s final presidential debate unequivocally, saying “Obama went very, very small — shockingly small.” “I think it’s unequivocal — Romney won,” Krauthammer said. “And he didn’t just win tactically but strategically. Strategically, all he needed to do is basically a draw. He needed to continue the momentum he’s had since the first debate.” He continued: “Tactically, he simply had to get up there and show that he’s a competent man and somebody you can trust as commander-in-chief, a man who knows every area of the globe and he gave a lot of interesting extra details…which gave the impression that he knows what he’s talking about. But there’s a third level, Krauthammer explained. He said “Romney went large” while “Obama went very, very small — shockingly small.” He also pointed out that Romney made a “strategic decision” not to aggressively go after the president on Libya and Syria or other areas so Obama couldn’t accuse him of being a “Bush-like war monger.” “Now, I would have gone after Obama on Libya with a baseball bat, but that’s why Romney has won elections and I have never even contested them,” Krauthammer added. What Romney did concentrate on is the “big picture,” he explained.