SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandintoes who wrote (57728)10/25/2012 3:20:01 PM
From: Hope Praytochange3 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71588
 
Strategies for the Stretch Run to Nov. 6 Over the last 40 national surveys, Mr. Romney is at or above 50% in 11, with Mr. Obama at or above 50% in one









By KARL ROVE This year's presidential election was transformed between the first debate's opening statements in Denver and the closing statements in Boca Raton. As a result, most of the negative impressions created by the Obama campaign's five-month, $300-million television advertising barrage were destroyed. Seen unfiltered, Gov. Mitt Romney came across as an earnest, straightforward, thoughtful conservative with a concrete plan for the nation's future.

Wednesday's RealClearPolitics.com average of polls showed Mr. Romney with 48% support to President Barack Obama's 47.1%. On the eve of the Denver debate, Mr. Romney had 46% and Mr. Obama 49.1%.

More revealing, in the past week's 40 national surveys, Mr. Romney was at or above 50% in 11, with Mr. Obama at or above 50% in one. Mr. Romney leads 48.9% to 46.7% in an average of these surveys. At this same point in 2004, President George W. Bush led Sen. John Kerry in this composite average, 48.9% to 45.8%.

So what are each candidate's strategies for the stretch run?

New television spots reveal the Romney campaign's closing message. One says another four years for Mr. Obama would mean more debt, up to 20 million people losing their employer-provided health insurance, higher taxes, rising energy prices and Medicare cuts. Other ads emphasize Mr. Romney has a plan for jobs and showcase his success as a Republican governor in a Democratic state.







Enlarge Image




Close

Reuters President Barack Obama

This three-part strategy—matter-of-factly indict Mr. Obama's failed policies, highlight a common-sense conservative agenda to create jobs and growth, and stress Mr. Romney's capacity to provide bipartisan leadership—was evident in all three of his debate performances.

The Obama campaign strategy also has three elements. The first was embodied in a glossy 20-page pamphlet issued Tuesday, entitled "The New Economic Patriotism: A Plan for Jobs & Middle-Class Security." Mr. Obama is distributing 3.5 million copies of it nationwide but it is too late: Voters concluded months ago that he lacks a forward-looking program. The pamphlet itself is a second-rate repackaging of Mr. Obama's lackluster convention speech and has been rightly dismissed by many in the press as a PR ploy. Even an accompanying TV ad swing won't rescue Mr. Obama.

The second strategic thrust of the Obama message was exemplified in three TV ads released on Tuesday. They warn that Mr. Romney would end all abortion, gut Medicare, and undermine education. But this repeats months of similar messaging, so it is hard to believe that it will undo Mr. Romney's current momentum.

The final element of Mr. Obama's strategy is to constantly question Mr. Romney's truthfulness. The president says his opponent suffers from "stage-three Romnesia," as if the GOP challenger were a disease. While calling his opponent a liar thrills partisans, Mr. Obama risks turning off swing voters, especially since Mr. Romney's favorability rating is now higher than his own.

In an Oct. 21 Monmouth/SurveyUSA/Braun poll of registered voters, Mr. Romney was viewed favorably by 49% and unfavorably by 39%, up from 41% favorable and 40% unfavorable on Sept. 16.

The president's problem remains the economy. Facts belie his argument that it is largely healed. Rather, it is producing jobs at a slower rate than last year, generating an average of 131,000 a month so far in 2012. At that rate, it will take three years just to get employment back where it was when the recession started, 138 million. Meanwhile, approximately four million to five million more Americans will have entered the workforce without jobs. Voters are uneasy and disapprove of Mr. Obama's economic stewardship.

This race will be close, depending on a few states. The good news for Mr. Romney is that the ones he needs are breaking his way. He leads in most recent polls in Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, New Hampshire and Colorado.

That puts the former Massachusetts governor at 261 in the Electoral College with Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and the great prize, Ohio, still up for grabs. In those states, Mr. Obama has at best a thin edge, while Mr. Romney has momentum, a stronger argument, and time to grab the nine additional electoral votes he needs.

An incumbent president's final number in opinion polls is often his Election Day share of his vote. Undecided voters generally swing the challenger's way. So if Mr. Obama goes into Nov. 6 below 50% in these states—as he now is in almost every one—he is likely to lose them and his chance at a second term.

Mr. Rove, a former deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, helped organize the political action committee American Crossroads.



To: sandintoes who wrote (57728)10/29/2012 9:14:01 AM
From: Peter Dierks2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Here's Johnny—the Campaign Oracle
In three presidential elections in a row, the 'Tonight Show' studio audience outdid pollsters in predicting the winner..
Updated October 28, 2012, 6:29 p.m. ET

By Raymond Siller
In mid-September 1980, following the two presidential conventions, Ronald Reagan trailed President Jimmy Carter in national polls, 44% to 40%. At the time, I was head writer for Johnny Carson's "Tonight Show."

Johnny held strong political opinions but never divulged them to viewers. He felt his mission was to entertain, not proselytize. He parked his personal views in the on-deck circle before blowing through the curtains, planting his feet on his monologue mark, and skewering whoever was in power.

By October, Gallup had the president up 47% to 39%. But America was experiencing sky-high interest rates, long gas lines and the Iran hostage crisis—and Mr. Carter's significant lead in the polls made zero sense to me. I persuaded Johnny to conduct a presidential poll of his studio audience.

We got NBC's props department to dust off an old applause meter. The late-night king played it straight, asking the 500 members of that night's audience to signal by their applause which candidate they planned to vote for in November. None who came to the show expected to be asked, and because the house lights were down, there was no peer pressure from their seated neighbors.


Johnny said, "How many of you will be voting for President Carter?" The meter's needle moved to the 30% mark. When he said, "Now how many will vote for Ronald Reagan?" the needle rocketed to 100% so fast I thought it would go airborne over the fat kid on the roof of the Burbank Bob's Big Boy.

After the show, backstage, Johnny was stunned by the results. His audience had defied Gallup and the other polling organizations of the day. We took the same poll the next week with similar results, a landslide for Reagan. On Election Day, Reagan won by 10 points.

Pundits will maintain that it was Reagan's "There you go again" debate zinger in October that handed the Gipper the White House keys. Reagan's debate performance certainly helped clinch a win. But there was a gnawing unhappiness in the electorate that all the polls missed. Jimmy Carter was toast long before their debate dust-up.

We conducted the same exercise twice in the fall of 1984 when Reagan's challenger was Walter Mondale. Our audience again chose Reagan by a wide margin, even though the polls suggested that the results would be otherwise.

Following the 1988 Democratic convention, Michael Dukakis held a 17-point advantage over Vice President George H.W. Bush. Yet our audience sampling picked Bush as the clear victor. The vice president ended up winning handily by eight points.

My feeling is that Johnny's studio audience, made up mainly of tourists from around the country, was as mainstream a group of typical American voters as one could assemble.

Johnny Carson's experiment bucked the pollsters and picked the winners in three presidential contests. If we postulate that studio audiences reflect the views of the host, Jay Leno's audience probably comes closest to representing the average voter. A Leno monologue attacks both sides evenly without signaling the comedian's personal preference. If Jay dusts off the primitive applause meter warehoused on NBC's back lot, we might not have to wait until next week to find out who the next president will be.

Mr. Siller was the longtime head writer on "The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson."

online.wsj.com