SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147018)10/25/2012 4:06:24 PM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
Why should Mourdock apologize for saying what he and Todd Akin believe?

How many times did Obama (the lying muslim) circle the world on his APOLOGY TOUR?

Soon, he can give his apologies to his fellow cons in the adjacent cells.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147018)10/25/2012 4:15:41 PM
From: locogringo6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
This is why your boy will lose, and lose BIG TIME:

I heard a hint of this on the Rush show today by a woman who was present. Something is happening across the country, and this may be why.........

At Red Rocks Co

And the governor, he lowers his head and his eyes shut tight and you could see him take a slow deep breath and then he lets it out and says quietly, but just loud enough for some to hear, “Lord, if this is your will, please help to make me worthy. Please give me the strength Lord.” And then his eyes open up, and he’s back to smiling and laughing and shaking hands and being the candidate once again. I’m 100% convinced Mitt Romney was shaken to his soul right then and there. I think at that moment it was sinking in he might really be the next American president, and it humbled him right to his core, in every nerve of his body. And as he was saying that little prayer, you could hear the sound of thunder from all those thundersticks outside. Like this huge low rumble that just surrounded all of them at once. A quiet little prayer, and the sound of thunder.

The sound of God.

theulstermanreport.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147018)10/25/2012 5:03:57 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147018)10/25/2012 8:30:31 PM
From: Ann Corrigan6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
IMPEACHMENT:Professors say Obama's Libya coverup could result in IMPEACHMENT if he wins second term.

There was one from each side of the aisle - one professor was a strong Obama supporter for most of the political discussion and the other a Republican. It was a call-in TV show - when a caller asked about what happened in Libya and what the Obama Adm is hiding, BOTH professors said the death of 4 Americans could very well be grounds for impeachment if Obama remains in the White House.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147018)10/25/2012 10:19:17 PM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Romney team eyes victory in crucial Ohio

Winning independents as campaign blitzes Buckeye State
by Jerome R. Corsi
Thursday, October 25, 2012
wnd.com


TRAVELING WITH THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN – As Gov. Mitt Romney meets enthusiastic, overflow crowds in Ohio from Cincinnati in the south to Toledo on Lake Erie, his campaign chief sees the election shaping up much like 2004.

If Romney wins Ohio, the campaign believes, he is likely to be the next president of the United States.

At each stop, Romney supporters patiently lined up at security checkpoints to see the candidate in a race the polls still show to be neck-and-neck in Ohio. But the campaign is exuding confidence, pointing to surveys of independent voters.

“In 2008, Obama won independents, but today we are winning independent voters overwhelmingly in Ohio,” Scott Jennings, the Romney-Ryan campaign manager told WND. “And there’s no way we can win independents by 10 points and lose Ohio.”

Jennings said the campaign, sometime this week, will cross the 2 million mark in number of doors knocked on since May.

“And we’re going to make the 6 millionth voter contact,” he claimed. “We are knocking on doors in all 88 counties. We think, absolutely, this face-to-face contact is what’s going to cut through all the clutter.”

He admitted Obama has an advantage in Ohio in terms of the number of offices and campaign workers.

But he argued the Obama offices are rented, and the staff are paid, absorbing resources.

“They’ve collected a lot of rent payments and a lot of leases,” he said. “We’ve collected a lot of volunteers.”

Jennings pointed out that in 2008, Obama won the early voting by about 20 percent, but with “their erosion and our surge” the Democrats are winning the early voting by only 6 percent this year.

“I’m not going to tell you we are going to win early voting, but we’re keeping it close,” he said. “We are going to blow them out on Election Day, and that’s how we’re going to win this race.”

Jennings noted that at this point in the race in 2008, Republicans suffered “an enthusiasm problem” in Ohio.”

“This year, we don’t have an enthusiasm problem,” he said. “All over the state of Ohio, even in Cleveland and Cuyahoga County, you are going to see the Republican ticket return to the kinds of margins Bush picked up in 2004.”

He expects the counties that surround Cincinnati, which are strongly Republican, to return to the 2004 margins that helped re-elected George W. Bush.

“The I-75 western corridor – that whole western column of the state – there’s a lot of red counties out there,” he said.

Jennings was equally excited about the opportunity in eastern Ohio.

“There is a lot of opportunity in the eastern part of the state, especially the southeastern part of the state, because of energy,” he said.

“Barack Obama does not like ‘in the ground’ energy,” he added. “In Ohio coal country, there’s a lot of fear about what a second Obama term would look like. We aren’t conceding any territory anywhere in the state, not even in the blue counties.”

Now into the final days of the presidential campaign, the election comes down to getting out the vote, what today is known as the “ground game.”

Here, Jennings is confident his team is beating Obama.

“Everybody senses we can win Ohio,” he insisted.

“This drives out more volunteers and more people to vote early,” he said. “Over the last two weeks, we are seeing more Republicans who voted in primaries than Democrats who voted in primaries turn in absentee ballots from Republicans than Democrats. This tracks with our polling. When we saw a ramp up in favor of Romney in the polls, we saw more Republican absentee ballots coming in.”

In the first stop of the day, Cincinnati, some 3,000 people packed into an open warehouse to hear Romney speak.

The theme, written in big letters against the podium backdrop, spelled out “JOBS” – perhaps the key concern in this year’s presidential election.


Gov. Mitt Romney at Cincinnati rally today (WND photo)

Ohio and jobs

On Wednesday, Ohio Republican Governor John Kasich warned of an economic slowdown ahead of the presidential election, exhorting Ohioans not to believe the state was in economic recovery simply because the latest Department of Labor statistics showed the state’s unemployment rate ticking down to 7 percent in September, after three consecutive months of holding steady at 7.2 percent.

There were still 406,000 unemployed Ohioans in September, a month in which the manufacturing sector lost 6,400 jobs, according to state figures. The decrease resulting primarily from losses in machinery and metal manufacturing, not from automobile manufacturing.

With an estimated one in eight Ohio jobs tied to the automobile industry, Ohio has the second-highest total automotive industry employment after Michigan.

Some 850,000 Ohio workers, many of them union workers, are being pressed by the Obama campaign to vote Democratic in thanks for the bailout of GM and Chrysler, for which the Obama administration takes credit, even though the bailout began in 2008 under George W. Bush.

In Ohio, Democrats are pounding Romney for an editorial he published in the New York Times, “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt,” in which he argued for a court-managed bailout, without tax-payer money, even though he was not opposed to government loan guarantees after the automakers emerged from bankruptcy procedures in court.

Republicans in Ohio counter by arguing that a court-administered bankruptcy procedure is properly viewed as a restructuring, not an end to a corporation’s life. In the government restructuring of GM and Chrysler, over $25 billion in assets, many of which were held by secured lenders, were redistributed to the United Auto Workers, a union that gave 99 percent of its PAC funds to Democrats in 2008.

The closure of Delphi auto parts has hit Ohio particularly hard, with some 20,000 retirees in Ohio losing part of their pensions, including 2,000 in the Akron-Dayton region of central Ohio.

With the government restructuring of GM and Chrysler, one in five car dealerships in Ohio were closed.

‘Nightmare scenario’ in Ohio

Ohio elections officials readily admit there is a nightmare scenario when it comes to early voting.

With some 7 million registered voters in Ohio, approximately 1.43 million have requested absentee ballots through Oct. 19, but only 618,861 had returned their vote by mail, USA Today reported.

The early voting rules under Ohio law could cause the nation to face an excruciatingly long process of waiting for Ohio to report, reminiscent of the Florida recount in 2000, if a large percentage of Ohio voters requesting absentee ballots change their minds and decide to vote in person.

Under Ohio law, those not returning absentee ballots will be given provisional ballots if they show up in person to vote, with the caveat that provisional ballots do not have to be counted until Nov. 17.

So, depending on how close the final vote is and on how many voters requesting absentee ballots end up getting provisional ballots because they voted in person, the nation might have to wait 11 days after the Nov. 6 election to find out who will be the next president.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147018)10/25/2012 11:20:20 PM
From: Ann Corrigan3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
Suddenly, a Credibility GapBenghazi has damaged voters' willingness to believe in Barack Obama.

By DANIEL HENNINGER[iframe id="f2d459f23c" name="f3745eea2" scrolling="no" title="Like this content on Facebook." class="fb_ltr" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=368513495882&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D11%23cb%3Df390c13798%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fonline.wsj.com%252Ff179e20ea4%26domain%3Donline.wsj.com%26relation%3Dparent.parent&href=http%3A%2F%2Ftopics.wsj.com%2Fperson%2FH%2Fdaniel-henninger%2F5468&node_type=link&width=90&layout=button_count&colorscheme=light&show_faces=false&extended_social_context=false" style="position: absolute; float: right; border-style: none; overflow: hidden; height: 20px; width: 77px; "][/iframe]LIKE THIS COLUMNIST


Article Comments (556)
MORE IN OPINION »

smaller Larger

Less than 14 days before the vote, Gallup has Mitt Romney leading the president by three points and in Rasmussen he's up four. This paper's poll brought Mr. Romney from chronically behind to even. Yes, 270 Electoral College votes will decide the race, but with the whole nation watching the same events, one has to ask whether what we're seeing is Mitt Romney's rise or Barack Obama's decline.

It is conventional wisdom that incumbency breeds advantages. But incumbency also brings burdens, and the Obama candidacy looks like it's buckling beneath one: Of the two candidates, the president is held to a higher standard of behavior.

There have been only two events that could be said to have caused significant movement by voters in the campaign. One was the Oct. 3 Denver debate in which Mitt Romney disinterred political skills that stunned the incumbent and woke up a sleeping electorate. Race on.

Enlarge Image





AFP/Getty ImagesVehicle inside the U.S. Consulate compound in Benghazi, Libya, Sept. 11.

The other is Benghazi. The damage done to the Obama campaign by the Sept. 11 death in Benghazi of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three American colleagues has been more gradual than the sensation of the Denver debate, but its effect may have been deeper.

The incumbent president has a credibility gap.

The phenomenon of a credibility gap dates to the Vietnam War and the presidency of Lyndon Johnson. The charge then was that LBJ wasn't leveling with the American people or Congress about Vietnam. The credibility gap was hardly the only thing that caused LBJ to withdraw from the 1968 election, but it eroded support for his presidency.

Credibility gaps can be unfair things. They generally involve difficult foreign affairs in which presidents possess information and realities never revealed to the general public, presumably for its own good. That may be what this White House believes about Benghazi. But it is also true that only this White House knows why it allowed the Benghazi disaster to drip though the news from September into October, with no credible account of the attack, even as reporters for newspapers such as this one got the story out.

In time it was no surprise that people began to ask: Was the White House hiding something about an event of enormous gravity to protect the president's candidacy? For much of the American electorate, that would be cause to start marking down a presidency.

Joe Biden didn't help in the Oct. 11 veep debate (a month after the event) when he off-loaded responsibility on the intelligence services. Days later, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tried to take responsibility at a conference in Lima, Peru. That didn't still the doubts. Rather than hold a traditional press conference like presidents past, Mr. Obama on Oct. 18 talked at length on TV to Jon Stewart, a one-man press pool, who asked the president to clear up discrepancies in the administration's account—"the perception that State was on a different page than you."

At this point, the answer hardly mattered. The discomfort over presidential credibility on Benghazi put the Obama candidacy in a six-week downdraft. Barring an October surprise, nothing similar is affecting the Romney campaign.

Even by the standards of our celebrified culture, Barack Obama's personalization of the American presidency has been outsized. He and his political team sought this aura. Hillary and the rest of the cabinet receded, while he rose. In Monday's debate, Mr. Obama stumbled into a summation of his status: "This nation, me, my administration." L'etat, c'est me.

Until now, it worked. Despite an awful economy, the president's likability numbers held firm. Many wanted to believe in this larger-than-life president. His clumsy handling of Benghazi, however, has opened a gap in the president's credibility. What else can explain Mitt Romney ascending in polls to equality with the president on foreign policy and terrorism before the last debate?

The discomfiture over Benghazi has spilled into other parts of his campaign. Among my top five events of the 2012 election will be that fellow in the town-hall debate who said, "I'm not that optimistic," and asked the president to address what he's doing about "everyday living" in America. He was asking the president he voted for why he should still believe. Mr. Obama diverted into telling him about ending Iraq and killing bin Laden. Instead of presidential assurance, he got talking points.

His weird, persistent vagueness about the shape of a second-term agenda has sown doubt about the economy going forward. Only now is that agenda being revealed, more or less, with a 20-page pamphlet, "The New Economic Patriotism." A new Obama ad urges viewers to "read it."

It may be that voters think both candidates have stretched the truth, but credibility is the coin of a presidency. The political cost of devaluing that coin is higher for an incumbent seeking a second term and higher still for this one. Two weeks from Election Day, Barack Obama has been shown in Benghazi to be a president with feet of clay. It may well take him down.

Write to henninger@wsj.com