Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TEDennis who wrote (1447)	12/1/1997 9:06:00 PM
From: tech	Respond to of 3391

TED, with all due respect, If what you are saying is true, you and the others who hold this stock are the naive ones. I made my CSGI investments and have traded the stock based on the following: 1. That CSGI was one of only a few, if not the only company that had automated both the identification and the conversion phases. You say that they are not 2. That other companies need hundreds and hundreds of people to convert code, while, due to their "Fully-Automated Conversion" CSGI could do projects with a limited staff. This would enable them to underbid the competition. Still don't know why this is, if they have nothing special. However, you have stated several times that they fall only in the middle of the upper and lower end of other year 2000 companies. 3. According to ConSyGen and the PR firms, both Janus and IRA, and one or two of the Press Releases: although other companies my exist that have comparable technology to ConSyGen's, they were not aware of any. You have stated that there are, and they are well know ones such as PTUS, SEES, and MatiDigm. If this is true, then ConSyGen should of surely known about them and their technology. 4. ConSyGen stated that their toolset supports MVS. You have stated that they are "weak" in some of those environments. 5. ConSyGen consistently suggested in the wording of their literature and through their PR firm that they have something no one else has. You are saying that they don't have anything special 6. ConSyGen said that during the conversion phase, not one line of code is converted by a programmer. You say that it is, by a CSGI programmer. Either you are full of shi* or the company is full of shi*, but you both can't be right. We can't have it both ways. either their tooslet does what they say it does and it is one of the only, if not only, toolset to have automated both the identification and conversion phase, or it is not. We can't say they have something no one else has, except for SEEC, PTUS, and MatriDigm. We can't say that they are not fully-automated and are just as automated as everyone else. I don't question you sincerity or your integrity in making the remarks you made. I could not think of a reason you would make up things or post something other than what you believe. After all, you are a shareholder of CSGI and anything negative you post will also effect your own personal portfolio. One thing you have to understand is that his company has gone to great lengths to establish a black and white distinction between themselves and the other year 2000 companies. We can't just put them in a gray area now. I have a very low average in this stock and if I sell at these levels, I would actually make some okay profits. However, like I stated, I will try to find out some answers before I make my final decision.