Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147220)	10/27/2012 9:35:35 AM
From: locogringo	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

There is a huge difference between a 20% rate cut from... Mebbe you ought to educate the clueless muslim president, who is all getting as hysterical as you get. Desperation? White House Considering New Tax Cut...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147220)	10/27/2012 9:50:06 AM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

A 20 percent (rather than 20 percentage points) cut from a higher level would be a larger cut. OTOH from a higher level the cut actually gives the government more money. As far as having enough to pay for essentials we could have a much bigger cut then Romney is proposing and still have enough. A lot of government spending isn't even desirable. A lot that is desirable isn't essential. Its not like the feds have been so tight and cut everything to the bone. Budgets have been bloated.