Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (95939)	10/28/2012 5:44:43 AM
From: Maurice Winn	7 Recommendations Respond to of 217573

That's laughable MC. Where on Earth did you get the idea that TJ, me, ElM and maybe others subscribe to "scientific racism" as per that link you gave? << Hard to believe that you proponents of scientific racism continue to thrive in this century>> You need to read and think to understand why we thrive. We thrive because that link you gave does not represent our thinking which is closely aligned with reality, which is the only sensible way to think, whether it's appealing or not. For example, people are made of mush and die. That's a very unappealing idea but it matches reality so we [speaking for others] tend to fit out minds around that rather than invent some fantasy to avoid thinking about reality. Barack Obama on the other hand believes in dialectical materialism [for which there is probably a Google link or Wikipedia or something], Marxism, redistributing the wealth and such-like conflicts with reality. Many people have tried it and umpty millions have died in the attempt. Heck, you might even find that "scientific racism" of your link is less harmful; if you actually read your link, you would see the close association of "dialectical materialism" with "scientific racism" and the catastrophes which ensue. Mqurice