SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 1:37:52 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224728
 
kenny...."Ohio does matter and Obama will win Ohio"....

And if hussein obama loses Ohio....What then kenny??????



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 1:42:12 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224728
 
kenny...If America should win this election and dump hussein obama...even with obama's acorn fraud votes across the country it should show even the likes of you just how much the majority detests hussein obama and all like him....and that includes you.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 1:54:21 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224728
 
blind deaf dumb idiot



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 2:02:23 PM
From: clear4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
BENGHAZI

Tin tyrants and bama's comin'
We're finally on our own

Gotta get down to it
Traitors are cutting us down
Shoulda been done long ago

This winter I hear the drummin'
4 dead in Ben-gha-zi

What if you knew them and
Found them dead on the ground
How can you run when you know?

4 dead in Ben-gha-zi!
4 dead in Ben-gha-zi!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 2:33:13 PM
From: Ann Corrigan2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224728
 
Oliver Stone Criticizes Obama..t.O.a.s.t.

Oliver Stone's new book rips President Obama

[iframe id="f1b386089" name="f5d4e02c8" scrolling="no" title="Like this content on Facebook." class="fb_ltr" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=172525162793917&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&ref=.UI7KAJwaZf4.like&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D11%23cb%3Df3ce9feed8%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.politico.com%252Ff204534d54%26domain%3Dwww.politico.com%26relation%3Dparent.parent&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1012%2F82993.html&node_type=link&width=90&font=arial&layout=button_count&colorscheme=light&action=like&show_faces=false&send=false&extended_social_context=false" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; position: absolute; overflow: hidden; height: 20px; width: 75px; "][/iframe] [iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1347008535.html#_=1351535115603&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1012%2F82993.html&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1012%2F82993.html%3Fhp%3Dr6&size=m&text=Oliver%20Stone's%20new%20book%20rips%20President%20Obama%20-%20Katie%20Glueck%20-%20POLITICO.com%3A&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1012%2F82993.html%23.UI7KAOz3mzo.twitter&via=POLITICO" class="twitter-share-button twitter-count-horizontal" title="Twitter Tweet Button" data-twttr-rendered="true" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; width: 112px; height: 20px; "][/iframe]



Stone's assessment of Obama’s presidency is tinged with disappointment. | AP Photos

Close

By KATIE GLUECK | 10/29/12 7:14 AM EDT
[iframe name="iframe_odiogo_0" id="iframe_odiogo_0" src="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82993.html?hp=r6" width="290" height="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; "][/iframe]

A new book from filmmaker Oliver Stone offers a scathing critique of President Barack Obama’s time in office.

Stone, who wrote “The Untold History of the United States” with historian Peter Kuznick, puts forth a liberal interpretation of American history from the turn of the last century to present day. The 618-page book, slated for release Tuesday - a week before Election Day - from Gallery Books, slams Republicans and Democrats alike, and the authors’ assessment of Obama’s presidency is tinged with disappointment.

"The country Obama inherited was indeed in shambles, but Obama took a bad situation and, in certain ways, made it worse,” Stone and Kuznick wrote. “…[R]ather than repudiating the policies of Bush and his predecessors, Obama has perpetuated them.”

Obama’s election “felt like a kind of expiation for the sins of a nation whose reputation had been sullied, as we have shown throughout this book, by racism, imperialism, militarism, nuclearism, environmental degradation and unbridled avarice,” they wrote.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 2:36:55 PM
From: longnshort6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
Voter's Pocket-Guide to Benghazigate



Thinking people inside and outside the Obama Administration felt the need to beef-up security at US installations in Libya and elsewhere in the run-up to the 11th anniversary of 9/11... yet Obama did not.The US consulate at Benghazi, Libya was attacked on 9.11.2012 in an intricately-choreographed raid by Al Qaeda associates armed with mortars, RPGs, and heavy machine guns.Our diplomatic people in Libya, the CIA, and the military felt bound by duty to rush to the rescue and save the Americans under attack, in fact at least one AC-130 was right there -and one of the former seals inside had even 'painted' the source of ground fire with a targeting laser- with orders from the WH prevented them from acting. Only the president it seems felt no such duty -even while sworn to do so-and was stubbornly opposed to any sort of US action, and for reasons that will never make much sense to the rest of us.



Barack Obama sat there in the White House watching the whole thing unfold on live video shot from a US drone overhead... yet did nothing to halt an attack on America that ended in utter destruction and the rape/murder of US citizens. Unlike his disingenuous version of events, Obama knew what was happening in real-time, and could see perfectly well that there was NO street demonstration in front of the consulate- yet he told us something else.After refusing to provide adequate security at such American diplomatic sites THEN not even allowing military action to halt the Islamic terrorist attack he all but invited, President Obama repeatedly LIED HIS LILLY-LIVERED ASS OFF to the entire country, and FOR WEEKS, purporting that there was a 'spontaneous street demonstration' (that never happened) one at least partially justified by some goofy YouTube video.He's also tried to tell us there was nothing we could do, that it's Hillary's fault, or maybe the CIA's... that he ordered our forces to do what it takes to secure our citizens under siege in Benghazi, that he was 'unaware' of requests of additional security in the preceding weeks... ALL LIES. Alas- unlike Watergate, the old-guard press has actively engaged in the cover-up.Now in a flailing attempt to deflect blame for his own stubborn stupidity, Obama has gone so far as to replace several top generals- what an oily reptile he really, truly is. Typically, Dear Leader still refuses to answer any questions re. Benghazi, and of course wants us to 'wait' for the 'results of the investigation', which somehow I have a hunch won't be completed until well after the election. But it's not an investigation we need, when the president can answer almost every relevant open question himself.Brett Baier says there's plenty of new tips coming into Fox, but I think I've seen and heard enough already: to be brief, nobody in this country should count on Barack Obama to protect them from ANYthing, nor should they expect one iota of truth out of this despicable regime... and if you're still thinking of giving this guy another four years after watching such a shameful spectacle unfold, what the hell is wrong with you, man?




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 3:15:26 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224728
 

Live stream into situation room as Ambassador Stephens was raped and killed:

youtube.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 3:43:55 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224728
 
House Armed Services Chair: Say, It Sure Doesn’t Look Like Obama Issued and Order to Help Americans in Benghazi

Posted by Jammie on Oct 29, 2012 at 2:07 pm

Home Featured Headlines Blog
Search for:

House Armed Services Chair: Say, It Sure Doesn’t Look Like Obama Issued and Order to Help Americans in Benghazi

Posted by Jammie on Oct 29, 2012 at 2:07 pm

[iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/l0vtENAUlvM?version=3&wmode=transparent" width="550" height="333" title="YouTube video player" class="yp" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; max-width: 100%; "][/iframe]

Brutal.

“If the president thinks that just throwing his hands-up in the situation room and saying, do whatever you can to prevent this, is equated with a military order, he’s sadly mistaken,” said McKeon. “If in fact he did issue such an order, and the order was not carried out by the military, then Congress needs to get to the bottom of it. But I don’t think he issued such an order. I think the inadequate security and not heeding the warnings leading up to the attack, and the seven hours that they watched this attack and did nothing to help our people on the ground, and then the six weeks of different kinds of responses, different stories coming out of the White House, the administration.

“The American people want to know what really happened,” McKeon said on Fox earlier today. “This is just a terrible response. The president’s leadership has been woefully lacking. Looks to me like a cover-up, they just want to keep everything under wraps, until after the election. But that just doesn’t cut it. We need to find out what happened. Why we left those people without protection. And why we did nothing to help them.”

The man needed his rest, obviously, before his big Vegas fundraisers.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/29/2012 4:28:33 PM
From: Ann Corrigan1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224728
 
Rare find--Dems who dislike statism, therefore will not vote for Obama..

October 26, 2012

Camille Paglia, who voted for Obama in '08, delivers a fine rant about why she's not voting for him this time.

She's interviewed on video here, by Glenn Reynolds. Most of the interview is about art in America and her new book "Glittering Images" (which I just bought, in Kindle). But in the end, she's asked why she's not voting for Obama — she's voting for Jill Stein — and out flow the words, which I started transcribing without knowing how long she'd go on. I kept transcribing, because it was all such great material, so here it is (with a few screen grabs, taken from the art section of the interview):
I was very excited about him. I thought he was a moderate. I thought that his election would promote racial healing in the country. This is the point at which I started transcribing, thinking: This is how I felt, when I voted for Obama in 2008. Except I wouldn't say I was "very excited." I wasn't caught up in the ecstasy. I thought it was the better bet, compared to the GOP alternative, and I hoped for the moderation and advancement in attitudes about race.
It would be a tremendous transformation of attitudes. And instead: one thing after another. Not least: I consider him, now, one of the most racially divisive and polarizing figures ever. I think it's going to take years to undo the damage to relationships between the races. Yes, this hope for racial transformation got squandered early, over that awful Henry Louis Gates incident. Back to Paglia:
But beyond that, I am just sick and tired of endless war. I was in favor of bombing the hell out of the Afghanistan mountains after 9/11, but I would have never agreed to this land war in Afghanistan, this endless land war, as well as things like this Libyan incursion that Obama appears to have been pushed into by these women, like Hillary Clinton and Samantha Power, the chaos in foreign policy, the bowing to foreign leaders.Also the Obamacare: of course, we need health care reform in this country. What a mess! Everyone agrees about that. But the Obamacare is, to me, a Stalinistintrusion — okay? — into American culture.The creation of this culture of surveillance, from these bureaucracies, which is also carried over into Obama's endorsement of drones on the military level as well as for police control of the population. I mean, I don'tunderstand how any... veteran of the 1960s who's a Democrat could not see the dangers here, that Obama is a statist. It's exactly what Bob Dylan was warning about in "Subterranean Homesick Blues," okay?I paused the video at "It's exactly what Bob Dylan was warning about" and asked Meade what song she's about to name, and he said "Masters of War," and I said "That's what I thought." But it's "Subterranean Homesick Blues,"and as soon as she says it, we know why. (Look out kid/They keep it all hid/Better jump down a manhole/Light yourself a candle...)
You don't want government agencies being empowered to intrude into people's lives like this. The controlling force in Obamacare is the IRS! Okay? This flies in the face of what the Free Speech Movement was about at Berkeley or about any of the values, I feel, of my generation.Yes. Exactly. This is how the Democratic Party lost me — by trading freedom for statism.
So I feel the Democratic Party needs to be shattered and remade to recover its true progressive roots. I don't see progressives. All I see is white upper-middle-class liberals who speak in this unctuous way about the needs of the poor.Unctuous. Yes. White upper-middle-class liberals lubricating themselves.
They have no connection whatever with the working class. Okay? It's the professional class gone amok. And that's why they don't notice what a bureaucratic nightmare Obamacare is.

Posted by Ann Althouse at 10:08 AM
Tags: 1960s, Afghanistan, art, baby boomers, books, Dylan, free speech, Hillary, Instapundit, Obama 2012, Obama and the military, ObamaCare, Paglia, racial politics, Samantha Power, Stalin, surveillance, taxes

Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook

[iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" hspace="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" tabindex="0" vspace="0" width="100%" id="I0_1351542039829" name="I0_1351542039829" src="https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?bsv=m&abtk=AEIZW7RpHCi9zkKpA10%2B8IBi7RHJ0BDKaCL1dsQWzcIetqX0Cbssj6Xh0RKM4L3yU07JvlXwGiZVpP0/dM917vLTZexmXtGz%2Bhw/jJK9DGEZGphMHlZCre8%3D&source=blogger%3Ablog%3Aplusone&size=medium&width=300&annotation=inline&hl=en_US&origin=http%3A%2F%2Falthouse.blogspot.com&url=http%3A%2F%2Falthouse.blogspot.com%2F2012%2F10%2Fcamille-paglia-who-voted-for-obama-in.html&ic=1&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fgapi%2F__features__%2Frt%3Dj%2Fver%3DG9D_qPqVja8.en.%2Fsv%3D1%2Fam%3D!EsUnt3hT0SSIO7F7ug%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAItRSTPlJTmKruD4_l4_OXefNJaJB1uikg#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled&id=I0_1351542039829&parent=http%3A%2F%2Falthouse.blogspot.com" title="+1" style="position: static; top: 0px; width: 300px; margin: 0px; border-style: none; left: 0px; visibility: visible; height: 20px; "][/iframe]

1 – 200 of 229 Newer› Newest»

Methadras said...
Democrats shattered to become a new progressive roots party? ROFL!!! What have you been missing paglia, this is what progressivism is you addled moron. You got it here. Now.

10/26/12 10:15

Bill, Republic of Texas said...Spot on.

I agree exactly with her analysis about the Dems going all upper middle class bullshit. We need one party in this country on the side of the working people.

The Dems have gone totally to the statist model. Tear down the party and rebuild it in the mold of FDR and JFK. I want to be a Dem but they keep pushing me away and telling me I'm not welcome.

10/26/12 10:17 AM

david7134 said...What is it about you people. Obama would not be able to pass a job interview, much less be considered President. But this woman and many others got all emotional and forgot to look at what the nut was saying. He is a Marxist and the group that supports him wants to see our country beaten down. They accomplished that, so thanks to women who can't understand what a person is saying, writting or the nature of his lifestyle that should have been flags that he is bad.

10/26/12 10:17 AM

Lem said...Paglia punches out Powell...

10/26/12 10:18 AM

Birches said...Wow. I'm glad someone has the brains to recognize the Statism. My husband and I were talking last night after the entire commercial break was taken up entirely by political ads. We decided that politics is just another version of sports, "well its ok when my team does it, but not yours because you're evil." I'm excited to vote for Romney because I think he'll be a good President, but if he's as good I want him to be, I think the Republican Party is probably going to hate him just like the Dems used to hate Clinton so much.

10/26/12 10:18 AM



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (147467)10/31/2012 2:55:56 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Respond to of 224728
 
U.S. Voter Turnout Will Likely Fall Short of 2004, 2008
Fewer voters this year say they are thinking about election, will definitely vote
by Jeffrey M. Jones

PRINCETON, NJ -- Key Gallup indicators of voter turnout, collected prior to superstorm Sandy, suggest voter turnout will fall short of what it was in 2004 and 2008. U.S. registered voters report giving less thought to the election, and are less likely to rate their chance of voting as a "10" on a 10-point scale, than in 2004 and 2008, two higher-turnout elections. However, the 2012 figures are higher than in 1996 and 2000, two lower-turnout elections.



The questions are two of the seven that factor into Gallup's likely voter model. The model assesses individual respondents' likelihood of voting by asking about current voting intentions and past voting behavior. "Election thought" and the 10-point "likelihood of voting scale" are the two questions that focus on current voting intentions and show the most variation from election to election. As the above chart indicates, in years like 1992, 2004, and 2008 when turnout was greater, more registered voters have tended to say they are giving at least some thought to the election, and to rate their likelihood of voting as high as possible. The percentages on these questions were lower in both 1996 and 2000, when proportionately fewer Americans voted.

Thus, the current data suggest turnout could fall in between the lower levels of 1996 and 2000 and the higher levels of 2004 and 2008.

The current results are based on Gallup Daily election tracking from Oct. 15-28. Voters' thought given to the election and voting intentions often increase closer to Election Day. However, superstorm Sandy has overtaken the election campaign as the dominant news event in recent days, which could in turn affect voters' attention to the campaign and voting intentions. Gallup has suspended its election tracking due to concerns about being able to adequately represent the U.S. electorate with so many in the East affected by the storm.

Additionally, the practical impact of Sandy and the storm's aftermath on voter participation this year is unclear, particularly in areas of the East and Mid-Atlantic where the effects could linger through Election Day on Nov. 6. Many voters in that area of the country who are engaged in the election and have every intention of voting may be unable to go to the polls on Election Day. Sandy could also have an effect on early voting in those states, though early voting is far less common in the East than in other parts of the country.

Implications

U.S. voters have not been quite as engaged in the 2012 election as in the two that preceded it, even before Sandy. However, their stated voting intentions and reported thought given to the election suggest turnout would likely not revert to the lower levels of 1996 and 2000. If turnout does come in lower this year -- that is, it looks more like 1996 and 2000 and less like 1992, 2004, and 2008 -- that may be another effect of Sandy in addition to flooding and widespread power outages.