SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oblivious who wrote (58181)11/1/2012 10:52:30 PM
From: greatplains_guy  Respond to of 71588
 
America needs a businessman in the White House
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Commentators have compared this year’s presidential contest to momentous elections from 1860 to 1980 and everything before, since and in between. The United States has stared down many threats to the Union before, and history would have been much different if Abraham Lincoln hadn’t been elected at the cusp of the Civil War nor Ronald Reagan sent to the White House to win a Cold War America was losing. No previous political season, however, had an incoming president staring ahead to such a long, cold winter as this republic now faces. Deficits and debt are bankrupting the nation. America needs a turnaround specialist to save the Land of the Free from its own mismanagement. That man is Mitt Romney.

Existential crises beckon greatness from national leaders. It usually isn’t obvious beforehand where the inner strength to fight for the future will be found. Certainly no one would have predicted what a profound effect a country lawyer from Illinois would have in the middle of the 19th century or the Hollywood actor — also from Illinois — in the 20th. One fact is manifestly evident though: American greatness will not be resurrected by the community organizer from Illinois who doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism. On President Obama’s watch, annual federal deficits top $1 trillion and the national debt raced past $16.2 trillion and is on pace to surpass $22 trillion (or 137 trillion Chinese yuan) by the time the next presidential term concludes in 2016. Already, Washington owes $140,915 per U.S. household, and the national debt continues to grow at a rate of $4 billion per day.

It isn’t alarmist to warn that out-of-control big government threatens freedom. No external enemy or internal insurrection can pose as much danger to the republic as our own indiscipline and profligacy. What will it mean when U.S. debt passes 22 thousand billion in four years? The Federal Reserve can tinker with the currency, keep the printing presses pumping out dollars and manipulate the markets, but that won’t change the harsh reality that the United States is tapped out.

Our politicians have to go hat-in-hand to foreign leaders for handouts, and those anxious to have us in their debt include regimes opposed to our democratic values such as communist China. Being indebted to foreign powers such as Beijing gives them sway in our affairs. This has severe national-security implications, and all so the bloated bureaucracy can waste trillions on programs a debtor nation no longer has the luxury to afford. “I’m not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for it,” Gov. Romney has vowed.

The United States needs a leader to fight today’s fiscal battle. With more than 23 million Americans unemployed and economic growth limping to reach 1.5 percent, the most pressing challenge is to revive the economy to get people working again. This will take an experienced executive to cut government spending and regulation to unchain the dynamism of the private sector. Mr. Romney has spent his life taking failing companies and revamping operations to make them competitive; he has the skills to do the same in the Oval Office. The Washington Times endorses Republican Mitt Romney for president.

washingtontimes.com



To: Oblivious who wrote (58181)11/2/2012 9:11:13 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 71588
 
Who can fix political gridlock? Poll favors Romney
By CONNIE CASS
Associated Press / November 1, 2012

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just about everybody agrees Washington is a gridlocked mess. But who’s the man to fix it? After two years of brawling and brinkmanship between President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans, more voters trust Mitt Romney to break the stalemate, an Associated Press-GfK poll shows.

Romney’s message — a vote for Obama is a vote for more gridlock — seems to be getting through. Almost half of likely voters, 47 percent, think the Republican challenger would be better at ending the logjam, compared with 37 percent for Obama.

With the race charging into its final week, Romney is pushing that idea. He increasingly portrays himself as a get-things-done, work-with-everybody pragmatist, in hopes of convincing independent voters that he can overcome Washington’s bitter partisanship. The AP-GfK poll shows the race in a virtual dead heat, with Romney at 47 percent to Obama’s 45 percent, a difference within the margin of sampling error.

At a rally Wednesday in Coral Gables, Fla., Romney recounted how he worked with the Democratic-led Legislature as governor of Massachusetts and insisted he would find common ground with Democrats in Washington, too: ‘‘We can’t change course in America if we keep attacking each other. We've got to come together and get America on track again.’’

Obama made his own show of bipartisanship Wednesday, touring superstorm Sandy devastation alongside Republican Gov. Chris Christie in New Jersey. A major Romney supporter, Christie has been praising Obama’s ‘‘outstanding’’ response to the natural disaster.

Obama counters the Washington gridlock question by predicting that Republican lawmakers focused on opposing his re-election will become more cooperative once he wins a second term and becomes ineligible to run again. Referring to the top Republicans in Congress, Obama joked he would ‘‘wash John Boehner’s car’’ or ‘‘walk Mitch McConnell’s dog’’ to help get a federal deficit-cutting deal.

Obama also argues that Romney is more conservative these days than when he was elected governor and will find his newer ideas don’t go down easily with Senate Democrats. For example, Romney, who worked with legislators to pass a health care overhaul in Massachusetts, has vowed to repeal the Democrats’ similar national health care law.

In the AP-GfK poll, about 1 out of 6 likely voters didn’t take a side on the gridlock issue: 6 percent weren’t sure who would do a better job at getting Washington moving and 10 percent didn’t trust either man to break the impasse among congressional partisans.

‘‘They all need to be taken by the ear by a grandma,’’ voter Margaret Delaney, 65, said in frustration.

She lives in Janesville, Wis., the hometown of Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan, and she’s leaning toward voting for the GOP ticket. But when it comes to ending gridlock, Delaney thinks it may not matter whether Romney or Obama is president.

‘‘I'm not sure either of them can do it,’’ she said.

A political standoff last year came close to forcing the government to default on its bills and led Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the United States’ credit rating. Over the past two years, a Congress split between Republican and Democratic leadership posted one of the least productive sessions in history.

When lawmakers return after Election Day for a lame-duck session, they need to work together with Obama to solve some festering troubles, including the ‘‘fiscal cliff’’ — a looming combination of higher taxes and spending cuts that could trigger another recession if Congress doesn’t find a resolution.

If re-elected, Obama will almost certainly face another two years or more of divided government. Polling in the states suggests Republicans are likely to keep the control of the U.S. House that they won in 2010. And tea partyers who stymied efforts to reach a deficit-reduction deal seem certain to remain a substantial presence.

There’s a good chance that a President Romney would face a split Congress, as well. Democrats appear to have an edge in holding onto their Senate majority, especially if the presidential race remains close. At least a dozen of the 33 Senate races remain competitive, making the overall outcome tough to predict.

Obama also likes to remind Democrats and like-minded independent voters that he serves as a check on congressional Republicans. The president suggests Romney would be unwilling to stand up to ‘‘the more extreme parts of his party.’’

Leigh Westholm of Pensacola, Fla., said that’s why she supports Obama’s re-election even though she doesn’t think he will be able to make peace with House Republicans.


‘‘It takes two to tango and he has tried and tried for four years,’’ Westholm said. ‘‘It might be better for Romney, but I don’t agree with his views.’’

But Romney supporter Gary Bivins, a 57-year-old West Chester, Ohio, retiree volunteering in his first presidential campaign, says don’t blame Congress.

A president needs the ability to lead, he said, and ‘‘I think Obama has shown no skill in that area.’’

The Associated Press-GfK Poll was conducted Oct. 19-23 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,186 adults nationwide, including 839 likely voters. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points, for likely voters it is 4.2 points.

___

AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius and AP writers Todd Richmond in Wisconsin, Melissa Nelson-Gabriel in Pensacola, Dan Sewell in Cincinnati and Kasie Hunt in Florida contributed to this report. The questions and results are available at ap-gfkpoll.com .

___

Follow Connie Cass on Twitter: twitter.com

Follow Jennifer Agiesta on Twitter: twitter.com

boston.com