SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/2/2012 3:55:37 PM
From: DanDerr1 Recommendation  Respond to of 71588
 
LOL! Keep deluding yourself! Drop by on Wednesday for a Critique!!!

Look how the Market JUDGES the Obama Economy!

Symbol Time &Price Chg &% Chg Volume Avg Vol Open Day's Low &High More Info
^DJI 03:52pm EDT 13,098.09 134.53 1.02% 92,760,341 - 13,233.39 13,076.57 13,289.45 Chart, News, Components


You are deleting the symbol: ^DJI from the portfolio: Pink Scams

RemoveCancel

^GSPC 03:52pm EDT 1,414.71 12.88 0.90% 433,477,525 - 1,427.58997 1,412.91 1,434.27 Chart, News


You are deleting the symbol: ^GSPC from the portfolio: Pink Scams

RemoveCancel

^IXIC 03:51pm EDT 2,984.67 35.39 1.17% 0 - 3,033.85 2,981.69 3,033.85 Chart, News, Components



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/2/2012 10:25:35 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 71588
 
MSNBC President Apologizes after Matthews Calls Koch Brothers ‘Pigs’

November 2, 2012
freebeacon.com

MSNBC president Phil Griffin apologized Thursday after host Chris Matthews called Charles and David Koch “pigs” in a segment with Rep. Ed Markey Wednesday.

Griffin apologized for Matthews’ “crass language” to Mark Holden, general counsel for Koch Industries, Inc., according to Newsbusters. Griffin said that Matthews would not be required to apologize to the Kochs.

In the exchange Wednesday, Matthews called the Kochs “ pigs,” and said he is in the “business of name calling,” after Princeton professor Michael Oppenheimer declined to join Matthews:

MARKEY: The Koch brothers want Romney, and Romney has promised, to roll back those fuel economy incentives. It endangers the planet. And it’s going to endanger young men and women who have to go to the Middle East to import the oil from there rather than backing it (ph).

MATTHEWS: Well, Professor Oppenheimer, back in the ‘60s, we called such people pigs. Pigs. No, really, they don’t care about the planet, they don’t care about the destruction of war. All they want is what they got, their stuff. And they want more of it. Is that what we’re facing here, just greed? I’m not talking about the guy working in the coalmine. That’s hard work. I’m talking about people who won’t listen to you, won’t listen to science because they want more stuff.

MICHAEL OPPENHEIMER, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Listen, Chris, I’m not into name-calling here.

MATTHEWS: Well, I am.

OPPENHEIMER: Fine, that’s your job, not mine.




To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:10:39 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:14:09 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:14:38 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 71588
 



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:16:57 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 71588
 



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:17:25 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 71588
 
Obama Escapes Scrutiny On Libya As Election Day Nears

In case you thought there was a thorough investigation to get to the bottom of the Benghazi disaster, think again. It seems the key player in the episode — President Obama — is taking no part in the investigation.

Jay Carney in Thursday's White House press gaggle told reporters:

"These investigations are being conducted by both the FBI and the Accountability Review Board, and he is not participating in the investigation. He is anticipating results that show us exactly what happened, who was responsible and what lessons we can learn from it in terms of how we ensure that it never happens again."

What about what the American people can learn about his role? That's not happening, it seems. But the good news is Obama's not planning on blocking the results of the investigations that don't include him:

"So the president is very committed to letting the facts come through and ensuring that we find out exactly what happened and who is responsible."

Don't expect any of this to tell us what Obama did, said and why he acted as he did. That's not happening so long as he's pushing the investigation off his plate.

This is quintessential Obama. When it serves his purpose to be the guy in charge (Sandy), even if no real duties are involved, he's all over the TV. When actual governance and detailed attention to national security are at issue, someone else is "responsible" when things go wrong.

Three advisers to Mitt Romney — Eliot A. Cohen, Eric Edelman and Meghan O'Sullivan — have an op-ed column in the Boston Globe Thursday, the closest the Romney camp has come in recent days to taking on the president on Libya. In detailing Obama's foreign policy failures, the trio writes:

"Candidate Obama defined our war with Islamist terrorists as being against the al-Qaida organization that existed on Sept. 10, 2001. But targeted killing is a tactic, not a strategy. The president and his advisers have crowed that the enemy is 'on the verge of strategic defeat.' That complacency explains their bafflement at the precisely executed mortar barrage, the rocket propelled grenades and machine gun fire that demolished our consulate in Benghazi, killing four Americans, including the first American ambassador to die violently in over three decades.

"The lapping of the Islamist tide through North Africa, Yemen, parts of South and Southeast Asia, and now in Syria suggests that they never really came to grips with who the enemy is. We have changed; so too has al-Qaida, which has spread far beyond the Pakistan borderlands."

Obama, you see, is not only responsible for the U.S. actions on 9/11/2012 but also for the faulty policy leading up to those events, as well as the serial misstatements following the murder of four Americans.

Romney hasn't personally taken up this issue for reasons that baffle conservatives. (It's not like the press is going to cover it if he doesn't speak up.) What is now clear is that Obama is trying to separate himself from these events, which is how he'll get through the election unscathed.

It is not such good news for his underlings, however, who will get blamed, or for the mainstream media, which, with some notable exceptions, have shirked their obligation to ferret out facts. The people have a right to know? Not so much in the Obama era with a lapdog press.



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:19:05 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Disasters Like Sandy Create Bigger, Not Better, Government

NEW YORK — Whew. That was the general reaction when President Obama told waterlogged New Jersey that "we are here for you." After all, these days, a president is expected to "be here."

Federal rescue is the American Way. Being there starts with helping to clear the flooded metropolitan-area tunnels between New Jersey and New York. But the concept extends to bridges, roads and all the other infrastructure challenges up and down the Atlantic coast after Hurricane Sandy.

Such rescue seems like a no-brainer during crises.

Yet the misty deification of Washington as exclusive rescuer isn't necessarily warranted. In fact, the United States suffers from a collective and politically induced amnesia that obscures the reality: There are many American ways to build infrastructure and manage it in emergencies. In the past, state and regional governments often managed disasters. Even businesses ran big domestic rescues.

A good example of this can be found in the history of one tunnel flooded this week, the Holland Tunnel, between New York and New Jersey. About 100 years ago, New York longed for commerce with New Jersey and was desperate for it. In the winter of 1918, for example, the city was so short of coal that the press spoke of "coal famine." An ice jam in the lower Hudson River prevented thousands of tons of coal in New Jersey from reaching Manhattan. The coal could be seen from freezing New York, but, as Gov. Al Smith recalled, "we were nevertheless unable to get it across."

Engineer Clifford Milburn Holland conceived a daring plan: a giant tunnel under the water. A new kind of ventilation would remove the fatal carbon monoxide gas from the tube. The construction itself caused its own share of emergencies.

Yet all these crises were handled, and not catastrophically, by local authorities. The Holland Vehicular Tunnel, as it was called, was conceived, as Smith said, as "the wedding of two commonwealths," the states of New Jersey and New York. The two states financed the project:

"New Jersey through a bond issue and New York through current revenues," Smith announced proudly.

Such states sought the blessing of the federal government, not its presence.

Nor was the Holland Tunnel the exception. Looking over American history, state or city authority in infrastructure was often the rule. Except during wars, state governments played a larger role in the economy than Washington. That relationship only reversed in the mid-1930s, with President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal.

The reversal hasn't always generated the greatest quality of work, or the greatest efficiencies. Indeed, the angel being called to drain the tunnels, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, is also known for wasting federal taxpayer money on dubious, pork-barrel projects and creating more problems than it solves.

Why has the federal role expanded?

One reason is another kind of flood: government spending. Once it rises, often to address an emergency at home or abroad, the spending doesn't recede. High water becomes the new normal, until the next emergency, when a second rise comes, as an economist named M. Slade Kendrick noticed as far back as 1955.

In a National Bureau of Economic Research paper titled "A Century and a Half of Public Expenditures," Kendrick noted that from the War of 1812 on, one kind of emergency — war — tended to raise the level of all federal spending, not just for the duration of the war but also for the period after. That spending increased for civil projects as well as for military outlays. The reasons for this are probably as much psychological as mathematical: When people are in a state of fear, they get in the habit of looking to big protectors.

Another scholar, Robert Higgs, has pointed out that the larger the government is, the more states kowtow to it. When federal money is available, whether from the Federal Emergency Management Agency or another source, only a foolish governor would ignore that cash.

That is why New Jersey's Chris Christie, a Republican, asked for help from the Army Corps of Engineers this week for beach restoration, and walked arm in arm with Obama. Natural disasters make even the feistiest Republican say, we're all Democrats now. As the pundits are already saying, the proximity of Hurricane Sandy will probably help the party of larger government, Obama's.

It's important, though, to remember that the only reason voters or politicians place so much faith in Washington is that they can scarcely remember a time when the federal government wasn't the rescuer. And that doesn't mean the past never happened, even in the Holland Tunnel.



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:50:11 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 71588
 
4 arrested for stealing Romney signs while driving sheet metal union truck...

4 arrested for stealing Romney signs while driving sheet metal union truck...



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 10:50:55 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 71588
 
REPORT: Obama supporters step up riot threats

REPORT: Obama supporters step up riot threats...



To: LLCF who wrote (58228)11/3/2012 5:10:47 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Deluding myself for giving you the INTRADE news??? Lol, if you think INTRADE is is so wrong you should definitely put your money where your mouth is! Romney is now payingore than 3:1!!!! Money talks, your BS walks.... As you will be come WE'D!

Lol, you ate allowed to post till EC makes it official if you haven't snuck away by then!!!

DAK