SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/2/2012 4:14:20 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32692
 
AAPL at $574.75... perfect touch of 50% fib of January gap and run after earnings from 444 to 705... if that breaks , 20% correction is at $564 and then $558 for weekly 50 MA. The monthly 20MA is at $500 and should not be ruled out if the weekly 50 MA breaks...



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/2/2012 10:36:40 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 32692
 
BREAKING...ANOTHER AWARD FOR NEXUS 7 - Stuff Gadget Awards 2012 – Tablet of the Year winner
stuff.tv




Google Nexus 7
from £160, google.com
Until the Nexus 7 came along there was really only one electronic rectangle worth spending your money on (if you’re struggling, its name rhymes with ‘iDad’). But the Nexus 7 beats that particular oblong to Tablet of the Year largely due to the fact that it’s ridiculously good value for money. Not only is it the best Android tablet, it’s less than half the price of the cheapest of Apple’s latest tablets. Its 7in HD screen and bump-resistant build make it more commuter friendly, plus the Nexus name means it’s at the front of the queue for Android updates. For the first time, a sub-£200 tablet is a viable alternative to the mighty iPad – and for that we salute you, Nexus 7. Read review



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/3/2012 9:04:02 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 32692
 
BREAKING..iPad mini is DESTROYING sales of the maxiPad [ed: I wonder who predicted that...LOL]
news.cnet.com
Apple's vanishing iPad
Call it the featherweight KO'ing the heavyweight. On the first day of sales, the 312-gram Mini knocked the 652-gram fourth-generation iPad into quick obscurity.
by Brooke Crothers
November 3, 2012 3:33 PM PDT

An untouched supply of the 'new iPad' (top) on Friday at a major U.S. retailer in Los Angeles. iPad Minis (bottom) were, however, selling. I wonder: were customers even aware there was a gen 4 iPad?
(Credit: Brooke Crothers)

The iPad we know and love seemed to vanish yesterday.

Call it the featherweight KO'ing the heavyweight. On the first day of sales, the 312-gram Mini knocked the 652-gram fourth-generation iPad into quick obscurity.

I knew there was a problem when I had to explain to people asking me about the iPad Mini that there was also this thing called the gen 4 (gen 3.5 may actually be more accurate) iPad.
And some stores weren't exactly aware of the new iPad either. A sales rep at a certain large U.S. retail store (which will go unnamed) in Los Angeles gushed about the iPad Mini but was stumped when I asked about the gen 4 iPad.

"You know, the one right in front of you," was (more or less) what I had to say.
Though I like the Mini, I'm partial to the fourth-generation iPad for, among other things, reasons I reported on yesterday.

It's the first iPad to get Apple's A6 chip -- in this case a turbocharged version called the A6X -- and every step the iPad takes toward laptop-class processing power has got my attention.
But I'm in the minority. The problem, of course, is that it looks the same as the gen 3 iPad, except for the Lightning connector.

There are other minor improvements too. The front-facing FaceTime camera has been upgraded to HD 720p video. The 4G/LTE iPad also works with a wider range of international carriers.
None of that appears to be enough to get people's attention, though.

And it's not going to get easier for Apple. With the Nexus 10 tablet, Microsoft Surface, and the crush of tablets and hybrids coming from the Windows 8 crowd, Apple is going to need to make a bold statement with the next 10-inch class iPad.

Until then, we have the incredible invisible iPad.



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/4/2012 12:28:45 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation  Respond to of 32692
 
BREAKING..Apple is SCREWED...
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2012
Next week's Apple-Google FRAND trial may be canceled on Monday morning
fosspatents.com

Five months after Judge Posner canceled an Apple v. Motorola Mobility patent infringement trial, the closely-related FRAND contract trial scheduled to begin on Monday (November 5) may suffer the same fate. In a very surprising "opinion and order" entered late on Friday, Judge Barbara Crabb reacted unfavorably to Apple's qualified willingness to enter into a patent license agreement. Apple had stated that it would take a license to Motorola's wireless (cellular and WiFi) SEPs on the basis of a court-determined FRAND royalty rate only if that rate does not exceed $1 per iPhone. In the event of the per-unit fee exceeding $1, Apple said it would exhaust all appeals and let the wholly-owned Google subsidiary continue with its SEP infringement actions.

Judge Crabb is not willing to order Motorola to make Apple an offer if the sole purpose of that offer may be to provide Apple with a bargaining chip. At a pretrial conference, Judge Crabb already expressed "concerns about determining a FRAND rate that may be used solely as a negotiating tool between the parties". She has meanwhile given this question further thought and now "believe[s] it would be inappropriate to grant Apple's clarified request for specific performance". While "t may have been appropriate to order exceptional relief in this case if it would have prevented continued patent infringement litigation or protracted negotiations", "it is now clear that specific performance would not resolve those concerns".

Not only is Judge Crabb now unwilling to order Motorola to make Apple a licensing offer but she is now also "prepared to conclude that the court will not 'declare' a specific FRAND rate for Motorola’s standards-essential patents" and raises the question of "what purpose would be served by the court's declaring that Motorola's actions constituted a breach of its FRAND contracts".

Apple may have overplayed its hand here with a "heads I win, tails you lose" approach. If Apple had committed to a license agreement on court-ordered terms (possibly with some possibility of an appeals court adjusting the fee, but without any doubt about the conclusion of, and immediate performance of the obligations under, such an agreement), it really appeared that Judge Crabb wanted to help resolve this dispute for good.

In the somewhat similar FRAND contract case between Microsoft and Motorola that will go to trial on November 13 in Seattle, Judge James Robart also told the parties at a summary judgment hearing in June that, in his opinion, they were using his court "as a pawn in a global, industry-wide business negotiation". But that case is well on track, and Microsoft agreed to take a license on court-determined terms, so the court can bring about a definitive solution (apart from appeals). Motorola Mobility pointed Judge Crabb to Microsoft's commitment and said that Apple should at least make the same kind of commitment. Yesterday's order shows that Motorola has convinced Judge Crabb that Apple's refusal to do what Microsoft has done is unreasonable.

Now Judge Crabb is even wondering "whether a trial should be held regarding Apple's other claims". If Apple prevailed on its other claims, it would hold a declaration in its hand that might render Motorola's wireless SEPs unenforceable against Apple.

Apple and Motorola now have until noon (Central Time) on Sunday to respond to the order, and the judge will discuss these issues with counsel on Monday morning at 9 AM. The judge can't say whether she "will be able to make a final decision on Monday morning so the parties should be prepared to commence the trial at 1:00 after discussion of these issues". She notes that "it is unfortunate that these issues were not raised earlier in this case so that they could have been resolved before the eve of trial". The way I interpret the order, there are now three possibilities:

  1. The concerns might be addressed satisfactorily, in which case the trial will go ahead as planned. If Apple dropped its reservation against any royalty rate exceeding $1 per unit, I believe it would still have a chance of resolving the FRAND licensing issue with Motorola at the upcoming trial. If Apple wants this trial to go forward, it must place enough faith in the court that a real solution can be put in place.

  2. The trial might be called off on Monday morning, even though the parties have already made and are over the weekend continuing to make preparations for it.

  3. If Judge Crabb is unsure even after the Sunday briefing and the Monday morning hearing, the trial will start on Monday at 1 PM but it could end abruptly after the judge concludes that Apple isn't entitled to the remedies it's seeking, or after the trial it might turn out that all the effort was made in vain. I'm sure that Judge Crabb doesn't want to waste court or party resources, so if her conclusion is that the trial shouldn't take place, I believe she'll stop the show on Tuesday at the latest.

Apple faces two challenges at this stage. It needs to address Judge Crabb's concerns at the legal level, but it also needs to avoid coming across as an arrogant litigant who is just trying to use the court system to its advantage, respecting only those decisions it totally agrees with.

Also on Friday, Apple brought a motion for reconsideration with respect to one of its motions in limine. In its motion for reconsideration, Apple makes an argument against Motorola's pursuit of injunctive relief over FRAND-pledged SEPs that is based upon the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Apple presents some interesting Wisconsin case law related to that general principle of contract law. In its motion, Apple also points Judge Crabb to this report by Reuters' Diane Bartz on an FTC staff recommendation to bring an antitrust lawsuit against Google over Motorola Mobility's suspected abuse of SEPs.



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/4/2012 6:58:05 PM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations  Respond to of 32692
 
BREAKING..Apple squanders its riches
By Joe Wilcox
Published 3 hours ago
betanews.com



Does anyone really like to be bullied? Is arrogance something most people aspire to achieve, or behavior socially embraced? You know the answers. But these qualities too much describe Apple since its sudden success starting in 2010. The company continually sticks a middle finger in the face of competitors, judges, partners, the patent system and pretty much anyone or anything else. The corporate attitude is a disaster underway that, unless checked, will ruin reputation long in the making.

The Cupertino, Calif.-based company makes many of the same mistakes Microsoft did during the late 1990s. Apple's most valuable commodity is its brand, which is being squandered at alarming pace. For a company for which so much stock share value derives from perception, the risk is huge.

Negative Perceptions

Signs of Apple's self-destruction and arrogance are everywhere:

- Bullying other companies in the courts
- Threatening retailers to stop selling Samsung devices
- Refusing to submit to court orders -- not once but twice in a single week
- Pulling from App Store developer partner wares with features that compete with Apple's own stuff
- Releasing half-backed products like Maps and Siri, with presumption consumers will just accept them

Apple's behavior is all so eerily familiar. During the 1990s, when computing kingpin like Apple is today, Microsoft displayed utmost arrogance -- such as dictating how PC manufacturers' brands could display during Windows bootup or what shortcuts partners could place on the desktop. As court documents reveal, the Redmond, Wash.-based company bullied OEMs by a number of tactics, including threats to withhold its operating system. Before US District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft lawyers and executives appeared petulant and snarked at every court request, or official order, to change business practices.

Corporate arrogance ruined Microsoft's reputation -- and where the company needs it most, among investors. Apple's trajectory is similar.

Microsoft's Story

Microsoft remains one of the most successful, and still hugely profitable, tech companies on the planet. During fiscal 2012, ended June 30, Microsoft generated $73.723 billion revenue and $21.763 operating profit. That's up from $25.3 billion revenue and $11.72 billion operating income during fiscal 2002, Steve Ballmer's first full year as chief executive. But the stock gets no respect, largely because Microsoft squandered its reputation. Microsoft shares closed at $29.50 on November 2, keeping to about a 12-year perennial below-$30 state. On Nov. 2, 2001, the stock sold for $30.70. Recent 52-week high: $32.95.

Three years ago I posted " 2000-2009: Microsoft's decade of shattered dreams", looking at so much right that had gone wrong. Microsoft lost its way, in part for losing its reputation, particularly among investors. Microsoft is the safe investment bet that the Street largely refuses to take. Two years ago I asked: " Why won't Wall Street give Microsoft a break?" Investors still aren't, which is amazing considering just how big is the streak of products launching over six months, starting in October.

Investors don't believe in Microsoft or its ability to innovate. Apple CEO Tim Cook would be wise to learn from the software giant. The company's behavior puts off people, and hurts corporate reputation. Given just how much shares move because of perception, Apple risks becoming the new Microsoft in a very bad way. As Windows' maker shows, reputation lost among investors isn't easily regained.

Apple's magic is more than earnings performance; cofounder Steve Jobs used his so-called "Reality Distortion Field" to make people believe in the company. But Jobs has left this world and taken some of the magic with him. Yet something of him remains: Corporate culture of arrogance and bullying, which has no check without Jobs as aspirational pitchman.

Consider recent stock performance. Apple shares closed at $576.80 on Friday, down 3.31 percent from the $596.13 open. Investors didn't receive October 23 new products -- and mighty impressive lot, too -- like other launches. iPad mini hasn't wooed the Street as many people predicted. Within the month, Apple set an all-time high of $705.07 a share -- on buzz about new products. Rumors proved more meaningful than reality. Shares are down about 18 percent since then, erasing gains since late June.

Boycott Apple

Apple's marketing messaging is largely the same, but the pitchmen are different and nowhere as effective. Meanwhile, bad corporate behavior erodes Apple's reputation. In October, YouGov BrandIndex observed a fall in Apple brand perception, with Samsung actually rising higher. Apple's court case, and subsequent win, against Samsung inflicted temporary perception problems for the South Korean electronics giant. Post-victory, the case works against Apple, particularly as people tire of patent lawsuits. By how much? Take a look at #boycottapple over at Google+ for a look how much. There's a Boycott Apple blog, which I only discovered this afternoon while finishing up this post, and active Facebook page, too.

In late May I started a personal boycott of the company's products and declared independence from Apple on July 4th -- that after being a loyal user since 1998. I'm mad about Apple's bad behavior, particularly that which stifles competition and innovation. What reputation hung on Microsoft following its US antitrust case loss: A company that works against innovation to preserve its monopoly position. That's one Scarlet Letter Apple shouldn't want.

I'm not alone. There is a subtle tsunami growing against Apple. On Halloween, Ed Conway, Sky News economics editor, posted letter: " Dear Apple, I'm leaving you". He gives five reasons under headings: "iOS 6"; "you've lost it"; "you're not cool anymore"; "you're screwing us"; "I don't need you anymore". They give pretty good sense what his problems are. By the way, "you're not cool" is part of Microsoft's biggest reputation problems. Apple, you've been warned.

Days earlier, Simon Phipps posted to InfoWorld: " Why I left my Macbook for a Chromebook". We share that in common. I moved to Chromebook from MacBook Air about five months ago. Old-time Apple users don't just leave. Buying the products is as much an expression of belief as anything else. Consider these switchers canaries in the coalmine.

There's a backlash underway that Apple might yet contain by being less litigious and more cooperative -- demonstrating technology leadership rather than protecting its own interests. As I've so often expressed: perception is everything.

Disclaimer: I am not an investor in Apple or any other company. I own no stocks.

Photo Credit: ARENA Creative/ Shutterstock



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/5/2012 6:51:21 AM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 32692
 
BREAKING..IDC - Apple's tablet market share IMPLODES from 90% to 50%, while Android skyrockets
androidos.in

Android tablet market surges in Q3 as Apple’s share comes down to 50pc: IDC
Android might have thoroughly captured the smartphone market in the third quarter, it is not the same case with tablet market, where Apple continues to lead but Android tablets have gained momentum in last one quarter.

According the latest numbers released by IDC, worldwide tablet shipments totalled 27.8 million units in the third quarter of 2012. The tablet market grew 49.5% year over year in 3Q12 and 6.7% over the second quarter of 2012.

The report also states that Android tablet shipments grew during this period led by Samsung and Amazon at the expense of Apple.

Apple is still a leader in tablet market, but market share come down to 50.4% in 3Q12 from 65.5% in 2Q12.

“After a very strong second quarter, Apple saw growth slow as both consumer and commercial (including education) shipments declined, and rumors of a forthcoming iPad mini began to heat up,” said Tom Mainelli, research director, Tablets at IDC.

Apple is followed by Samsung, Amazon, Asus and Lenovo, all of whom make Android tablets. The numbers from fourth quarter will be interesting to see as Amazon has released its tablets in new markets outside US, Google has also launched two new tablets and Apple iPad Mini is comparably higher pricing is likely to help in Kindle Fire HD and Nexus 7 sales.



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/5/2012 6:55:42 AM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 32692
 
Apple losing MASSIVE market share AND profit share in smartphones and tablets, while Android hitting new highs in both...
readwrite.com



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/5/2012 6:58:22 AM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 32692
 
Samsung Galaxy S3 passes 30 million sales mark worldwide in 5 months
By Edwin Kee on 11/04/2012 23:17 PST
ubergizmo.com


The Samsung Galaxy S3 is definitely a quantum leap in hardware improvement where the Android-powered smartphone scene is concerned when it was first released, and the sales run of the Samsung Galaxy S3 has been pretty impressive to say the least in the past five months ever since it debuted in May this year. Having passed the 30 million sales mark worldwide, it is a marked improvement compared to its predecessor, the Galaxy S2 that moved a mere 10 million units in the same time period. The Samsung Galaxy S3 comes in different configurations for various countries around the world, with select models carrying LTE connectivity as well as 2GB RAM.

Not only that, the Samsung Galaxy S3 is now upgradeable to Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, depending on which country you reside in, and depending on your taste, you can choose from Brown, Garnet Red, Sapphire Black and Titanium Grey colors. Samsung has iterated that they will continue to deliver software upgrades in the future for the Samsung Galaxy S3, ensuring your smartphone experience will not be a gimped one – and they’re most probably hoping you won’t make the switch to the iOS ecosystem as well.



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/5/2012 8:19:27 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation  Respond to of 32692
 
BREAKING..For The First Time Ever, iPhone Owner Loyalty Declines
9:00 AM - November 4, 2012 by Zak Islam - source: Strategy Analytics
tomshardware.com

Loyalty of iPhone owners in both the United States and Europe experiences first ever decline.

For the first time since the iPhone's inception, the percentage of the smartphone's owners who say they will definitely or probably buy another Apple handset has declined.

According to research conducted by Strategy Analytics, a study found that 88 percent of U.S. iPhone owners are likely to buy another Apple smartphone, representing a decrease from 93 percent last year. In Western Europe, meanwhile, the total stands at 75 percent, which is a decrease from 88 percent in 2011.

While the firm argues that Apple is attracting new customers, it says that negative press has led to the aforementioned decrease in consumer interest for iPhones.

"There is no doubt that Apple is continuing its success in retaining existing user base while attracting new customers," said Paul Brown, director at Strategy Analytics' User Experience Practice. "However, negative press prompted by a perceived lack of recent innovation by Apple has meant we are starting to see some growth in the number of previously highly loyal consumers who are now reconsidering whether or not they will purchase a new iPhone for their next device."

Taryn Tulay, an analyst at Strategy Analytics, explained that "it is the shift in the number of those who are unsure whether they will remain with the same brand for their next phone that Apple should be concerned about."

Recent figures from Kantar Worldpanel ComTech shows that while Apple's iOS is increasing its market share in the U.S., Android's market share increased across Europe in the 12 weeks of sales that ended on September 30. Google's mobile platform enjoyed a market share increase to 67 percent in the region, which is a considerable increase from the 51 percent share it held last year.



To: puborectalis who wrote (23287)11/5/2012 8:26:36 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32692
 
Something's Wrong At Apple
By Nicholas Carlson | Business Insider – 1 hour 17 minutes ago
finance.yahoo.com

Apple, the world's most valuable company, is suddenly in a rut.

- A new report says 75% of smartphones out there are Android phones, and only 15% are iPhones.
- For the first time ever, iPhone customer loyalty is declining.
- Scott Forstall was suddenly booted from the company last week. He was the creator of iOS, Apple's most prolific inventor, and a former "CEO-in-waiting."
- The stock is cratering. It's down to $576 after peaking above $700 in min-September.
- Apple whiffed on iPad sales during its fiscal fourth quarter.
- Recent "refresh" of all big products has left them looking at 6 to 9 months of dead time.
- After hiring a new retail boss ~6 months ago, Tim Cook fired him last week.