SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greatplains_guy who wrote (519401)11/6/2012 1:42:31 AM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793586
 
>> Christie had to play nice if he wanted New Jersey to get any.

Of course. I thought that was totally obvious at the time. Haley Barbour, no amateur on this subject, addressed it on Sunday -- you don't criticize the administration you may be working with for the next several years. Same thing has happened with Netanyahu. Netanyahu clearly cannot stand Obama, but no way in hell he's going to criticize him when he's in a 50/50 race which he may win.

I can promise you Christie and Netanyahu are both going to be up late tomorrow because they do have a preference.



To: greatplains_guy who wrote (519401)11/6/2012 2:40:12 AM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793586
 
I wonder what the consequences would be for the people of nj if the funds weren't there? Christie would definitely lose his job.



To: greatplains_guy who wrote (519401)11/6/2012 7:05:24 AM
From: John Carragher3 Recommendations  Respond to of 793586
 
i can't believe you think the bishop of the mormon church would cut funds to n.j.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News