SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (26334)12/2/1997 1:44:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Respond to of 1572789
 
Yousef; Since I am not a designer I am falling back on a mechanical analog, of say a valve train in a car which has mech components that have to be in the right place at the right time for the car to work. As they run faster the minor tolerances, spring constants etc and at some point it fails when run faster and faster. By analogy the internal gates, how they rise, fall settle will have a similar max frequency of operation. This will vary somewhat with all the various times allotted by the design team for them, and they will shave a fraction here and there and tighten up these chains to result in a faster speed before a conflict occurs. Part of the potential will be realized by superior design, and part by superior fabrication. I made no mention of Intel versus others in terms of speed and design, and they are the overall leader in the area, however like many large companies they are becoming susceptable to nimble competitors, like AMD, Cyrix etc who can make the optimization cycles(both in design and production) more rapidly than Intel and eventually get quite close to Intel in performance.
I suspect that an outside arbiter who rated each stage(benchmarked them) of design/prototype/production of AMD/Intel/Cyrix would be able to provide an estimate of who will gain/lose over time. I think Cyrux and AMD(Nexgen) have done very well to advance upon Intel and shave the Intel advantage down to where it has forced Intel to be pre-emptively competitive.
Intel with large plants and huge reserves is not guaranteed to keep the lead with current x86 stuff, and thus we see an attempt to make a new proprietary Slot 1 and the ensuing merced chip, which it hopes it will not have any competitors to share shelf space with in the future.
Will the others get a competitor to merced?, some scheme to run as fast on the same software, and not infringe?

One hopes they will, as I want competition in that arena to save me money. Will the merced be a step too far and end up a proprietary enclave at a premium price, and fallen share like Apple?
It could happen if Intel gets too greedy and the clever mammals at AMD/Cyrix find a way around the dinosaur.

Bill