Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (519870)	11/7/2012 1:08:29 AM
From: LindyBill	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793561

Re: candidate in 2016 We had nobody better than Mitt to run. I see nobody to get excited about for the next one yet.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (519870)	11/7/2012 1:30:14 AM
From: greatplains_guy	7 Recommendations Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 793561

Maybe Republicans should try running a Conservative. In a year in which the incumbent was so hated that anyone could win Republicans managed to lose by running a New England liberal. Four years ago they lost with a war hero liberal. Republicans don't get excited to vote for a liberal. Obama needed to be defeated. In the end Romney thought his winning the first debate was enough. It was not enough to look and act Presidential after a single win. And then Sandy came and swept more than the democrat controlled upper Eastern seaboard away. Sandy swept away the chance America had to redeem herself. Blame it on the weather.