SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (520470)11/7/2012 9:11:59 PM
From: Nadine Carroll4 Recommendations  Respond to of 793842
 
You too need to read the rest of what I wrote in that comment. If Catholic Hospitals want to run as fully private church institutions the government will happily leave them alone. The problem is they want the best of both worlds. As I said, tough luck and no sympathy for that nonsense.

No it won't. Hospitals (except for the very rich) are not allowed to run as fully private institutions because the Feds already pay 50 cents of every medical dollar, and that's before Obamacare. And the Feds makes the rules. Until Obamacare, the Federal government kept to its tradition of allowing religious institutions freedom of conscience. But under Obamacare, the 1st amendment doesn't count anymore.

So you're demanding that religious institutions that want to serve the needy must jettison their religious principles if the Feds say so.



To: neolib who wrote (520470)11/7/2012 9:14:03 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Respond to of 793842
 
If Catholic Hospitals want to run as fully private church institutions the government will happily leave them alone.
Would the government still leave them alone if they only treated Catholic patients.