Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (521630)	11/10/2012 11:07:10 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793670

"I support requiring a thumbprint to vote." with the dems in control not gonna happen, voter ID not gonna happen, doing something about inner city voter fraud not gonna happen

To: goldworldnet who wrote (521630)	11/10/2012 11:19:22 AM
From: ManyMoose	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793670

I see that you are still one step ahead of me. re: I support requiring a thumbprint to vote.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (521630)	11/11/2012 1:12:55 PM
From: greatplains_guy	2 Recommendations Respond to of 793670

I support requiring a thumbprint to vote. That would give a huge voting advantage to people like me who are all thumbs. <:-)

To: goldworldnet who wrote (521630)	11/11/2012 11:09:34 PM
From: simplicity	10 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793670

Your thumbprint idea is a great one, but it will never happen. There is so much evidence of voter fraud in this election that it is mind-boggling -- and most of it appears to have occurred in swing states and big cities. It's as if it were all choreographed for months, if not years, in advance. If the powers that be won't even allow voter ID, they certainly aren't going to even entertain the idea of thumbprints. Those in power do not want accurate voting. They want fraud, and they want it on a large scale. The mainstream media refuses to cover all of the fraud that appears to have occurred on Tuesday, and FoxNews isn't even giving it the coverage it deserves. Even if they did, anything that emanates from Fox is automatically labeled as 'biased' and 'partisan' by the rest of the news industry and our 'leadership' in D.C. -- an opinion that the majority of useful idiot Americans will mindlessly echo as 'enlightened'. Even if it were brought to light to the degree that it should be, the courts are now officially so stacked with activist, leftist judges that the number of recounts required to put the victory in the correct column would never be ordered. Even if they were, who knows how accurate the recounts would be? If you can succeed in placing a sufficient number of people in the right places to commit voter fraud, you can also succeed in placing a sufficient number of people in recount observation positions to sway a recount. There is historically unprecedented corruption in every area of modern American society -- on Capitol Hill, in the White House, the state and federal courts, the mainstream media, election officialdom, institutions of 'higher education' ... the list is endless. Any American, or group of Americans, seeking justice these days will have a difficult time obtaining it unless the powers that be decide that it adheres to their own self-serving definition.