Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (521730)	11/10/2012 5:50:29 PM
From: dalroi	Respond to of 793838

Man do They select for 1/ good looking means healthy else they cant get children or not care for them 2/ intelligence ,at least high iq males do, rest dont matter 3/universities make easy selecting areas just see if she gets a grade and you at least have a good basic idea

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (521730)	11/10/2012 6:30:18 PM
From: Maurice Winn	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793838

See how easy it is to start thinking like a government department. Already you have specified jobs and marital status and are now wanting to have a department of woman testing. < Curious who is going to test the women since they contribute half the dna? Considering so many voted for obama, it's not looking good. :-) > It's all taken care of in the expression; "When you think your spouse is beneath you, just remember you are as good as they could get". Blokes [and males of whatever species] are happy enough to donate sperm to any female that passes by [and some species are not too discriminating about what they call a female - dogs will mate with human legs or cats. Human males will make do with prostitutes, or even inflatable mannequins and there is an old joke about sheep and gumboots]. So the main discriminating to be done is by the women. I know it's very unfashionable to say so, but the primary purpose of women is to select men and make healthy protected children. I know some try to run corporations and even get the job these days. Those companies are normally good to short when you see a woman appointed. The reason women reach puberty three years younger than men is that it is so important that they get to child breeding time to get the human numbers up that their brain development is shortened, meaning they get less experience than males before they become old dogs who can't learn new tricks. Males on the other hand are in great surplus as far as breeding goes so it's more important to give them a long brain development time so they can learn more tricks of the trade before they go out on their own to do battle with life. That's why men are top of all intellectual pursuits. They cheat by getting another 3 years of experience. Maybe testosterone pollution makes them madly competitive too. Sensible women with less testosterone can't see the point of meeting on a battlefield with swords or wits to see who is better. Women do better at education than men because they have bigger brains at a younger age, so while still at school, they have big adult brains while boys are still picking their noses and farting for fun. Some would argue that males never get a proper adult brain but they are being sexist which is not acceptable these days, unless we vote for Islam to take over, which lots are in favour of, including women. The reason women vote for Obama and big government more than men is because they invariably find their husbands somewhat disappointing and think that having all men paying taxes and a Big Brother type government with a "strong man" as leader is a good idea. Males are naturally more inclined to individual competition for the harem so tend to dislike being just one of the serfs. Males want to rule the roost, even if it's a little roost. Women are happy being part of the collective. Or, maybe you are right and their intellectual deficit results in Clintonistic Obamania. Men and women are definitely different. Maybe we should ask some women who know about these things why women mature three years earlier and what effect that has on their brains. They experience it up close and personal so should have a good idea. I know for myself that at engineering school, I could understand and absorb kilograms of information in a short time whereas at school a small amount was more than enough. Having a full grown brain definitely helps pile heaps in, but the developing brain is needed to absorb and integrate the learning and thinking framework. So a lengthy childhood is good, followed by a substantial knowledge absorption time, with a long enough life to get our money's worth from the two or three decades of effort getting up to speed. Unsurprisingly, nature has arranged exactly that. But is short-changing us on the life expectancy if you ask me, which you didn't. When I carry a cute little grand child or have them out for a run around, it's droves of women who come flocking, whereas blokes pass a cursory glance at best. Chick-magnet is exactly right. On my own in a children's playground, they would stay well clear or perhaps phone the police, but with a cute infant, it's totally different. It is instinct at work, not play acting by the blokes and sheilas. Your mileage may vary. Everyone is an individual. For those who have not got a PhD in maths, this does not mean that if you are male, you are more intelligent than any woman you meet. It does not mean that all women are caring nurturers. It does not mean all males who like children are paedophiles. But how come a person who likes French things is a francophile, a person who likes books is a bibliophile, but paedophile is a bad thing? What's the word for "Likes children but is not a dangerous sex loon"? It should be paedophile and a different word used for dangerous sex loon. Mqurice