SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (684459)11/12/2012 1:29:18 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571798
 
Some interesting stats............they show just how divergent the South when compared to the rest of the country:

NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE (as of 10 AM 11/10/12):

Obama : 61,820,108 (50.54%)
Romney : 58,563,101 (47.88%)
Others : 1,927,014 (1.58%)

NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE OUTSIDE THE SOUTH (as of 10 AM 11/10/12):

Obama : 42,769,338 (53.95%)
Romney : 35,100,308 (44.28%)
Others : 1,405,601 (1.77%)



To: puborectalis who wrote (684459)11/12/2012 10:13:25 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571798
 
British newspaper calls Obama “ineffectual, invisible, the weakest president in history”by EDITOR on MARCH 23, 2011

Pip, pip, cheerio, chaps. Blimey, guv-nah! (Sorry, but that’s the best we can do at faking that language they speak in the United Kingdom).

The Express UK says what American newspapers are so hesitant to say, in an article entitled, “BARACK OBAMA: THE WEAKEST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY?”:

When the Brits said, "It's tea time," President Obama said, "Let's play 18."

INEFFECTUAL, invisible, unable to honour pledges and now blamed for letting Gaddafi off the hook. Why Obama’s gone from ‘Yes we can’ to ‘Er, maybe we shouldn’t’

Let us cast our minds back to those remarkable days in November 2008 when the son of a Kenyan goatherd was elected to the White House. It was a bright new dawn – even brighter than the coming of the Kennedys and their new Camelot. JFK may be considered as being from an ethnic and religious minority – Irish and Catholic – but he was still very rich and very white. Barack Obama, by contrast, was a true breakthrough president. The world would change because obviously America had changed.??

Obama’s campaign slogan was mesmerisingly simple and brimming with self-belief: “Yes we can.” His presidency, however, is turning out to be more about “no we won’t.” Even more worryingly, it seems to be very much about: “Maybe we can… do what, exactly?“ The world feels like a dangerous place when leaders are seen to lack certitude but the only thing President Obama seems decisive about is his indecision. What should the US do about Libya? What should the US do about the Middle East in general? What about the country’s crippling debts? What is the US going to do about Afghanistan, about Iran???

What is President Obama doing about anything? The most alarming answer – your guess is as good as mine – is also, frankly, the most accurate one. What the President is not doing is being clear, resolute and pro-active, which is surely a big part of his job description.

Amazing, isn’t it, that people who have English as a second language would be able to state the situation so clearly.

Source: Express UK



To: puborectalis who wrote (684459)11/12/2012 11:17:59 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1571798
 
Did Petraeus mistress reveal secret CIA prison? Paula Broadwell may have divulged new information on Benghazi scandalPosted on November 11, 2012 at 11:49 AM EST



By Aaron Klein

TEL AVIV — Did Paula Broadwell, the alleged mistress of ex-CIA Director David Petraeus, reveal a secret CIA detention center in Benghazi during a public speech she gave last month?

Broadwell, a former counterterror operative, co-authored a bestselling biography of Petraeus. She discussed the book during a keynote speech on Oct. 26 at a University of Denver alumni symposium. The speech is available in full on YouTube.

During a question and answer session, Broadwell was asked about the September 11 attacks against the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

She stated: “Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted.”

The existence of a U.S. prison or CIA detention center in Benghazi would be a new development in the debate surrounding the attacks there. The information does not appear to be publicly known.

An extensive KleinOnline search of news media coverage of the Benghazi attacks could find no mention of prisoners being held at the CIA annex.

Today, a CIA spokesperson denied Broadwell’s claim of a prison at the Libyan annex.

The spokesperson told The Daily Beast that “[t]he CIA has not had detention authority since January 2009, when Executive Order 13491 was issued. Any suggestion that the Agency is still in the detention business is uninformed and baseless.”

On Saturday, The New York Times reported that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor spoke to an FBI whistle-blower two weeks ago who accused Petraeus of not only having an extramarital affair but potentially jeopardizing the security of classified information.

During the same university speech, Braodwell may have also divulged information that Petraeus knew “within 24 hours” of CIA annex’s request for reinforcements, reported Israel National News.

“The challenging thing for Gen. Petraeus,”she stated, “is that in his new position, he’s not allowed to communicate with the press. So he’s known all of this – they had correspondence with the CIA station chief in Libya, within 24 hours they kind of knew what was happening.”

Earlier she had said the military could have sent reinforcements.

“They were requesting the – it’s called the C-in-C’s In Extremis Force – a group of Delta Force operators, our very, most talented guys we have in the military. They could have come and reinforced the consulate and the CIA annex.”



To: puborectalis who wrote (684459)11/12/2012 11:43:11 AM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571798
 
The voice of Sesame Street's Elmo denies he had gay sex with a minor
Published November 12, 2012

FoxNews.com


Kevin Clash (right) and Elmo. (Reuters)



The man who voices Sesame Street's popular character Elmo is denying he had gay sex with a minor, as Sesame Street honchos try to assure fans that the high-pitched puppet is "bigger than one man."

Kevin Clash has taken a leave of absence from Sesame Street Workshop to defend himself from allegations he had a a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old boy, according to a report by TMZ.

The accuser, now 23, says he and Clash engaged in sexual acts when he was 16 and Clash was 45.

Clash admitted to TMZ he and the individual had sex, but only after he was above the age of consent.

"I had a relationship with [the accuser]," Clash said. "It was between two consenting adults and I am deeply saddened that he is trying to make it into something it was not."

The popular children's show acknowledged the relationship and their involvement in the investigation.

"In June of this year, Sesame Workshop received a communication from a young man who alleged that he had a relationship with Kevin Clash beginning when he was 16-years-old," a rep for Sesame Street said in statement. "This was a personal relationship, unrelated to the workplace. We took the allegation very seriously and took immediate action."

The accuser is being represented by Andreozzi and Associates, a firm that represented one of Jerry Sandusky's rape victims.

"Elmo is bigger than any one person and will continue to be an integral part of Sesame Street to engage, educate and inspire children around the world," Sesame Street's rep said.

Still, Clash is not just a behind-the-scenes voice. In 2011, he starred in the documentary "Being Elmo," which got rave reviews and won the Special Jury Award at the Sundance Film Festival.

"When I was nine years old, it was just a dream that I had: Wow, I wish that I could work with the Muppets" Clash says in the film's trailer.

The movie follows Clash's journey to become the ticklish puppet, describing a child who sewed his own dolls and moved to New York after high school to try and land a role as a puppeteer.

Clash appeared on several shows to promote the film around the time of it's Sept. 2011 release, putting a face to the distinct Elmo voice.

In earlier years, he also appeared in several interviews with Australian TV personality Rove McManus and mentioned he has a daughter.

Clash also co-authored a book about his journey in 2006 titled "My Life as a Furry Red Monster: What Being Elmo Has Taught Me About Life, Love and Laughing Out Loud."

Read more: foxnews.com