Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sh who wrote (6082)	12/2/1997 11:24:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

7.625 x 8.125 creeping back upwards

To: sh who wrote (6082)	12/2/1997 12:13:00 PM
From: Jan A. Van Hummel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

sh Ledoux was contracted by Naxos, so they can only report to Naxos. Not doing so, or leaking information to third parties would have serious legal implications. There are two critical issues. First, Naxos can only state that results were determined by Ledoux if Ledoux indeed did do so. Second, Naxos can only state these were COC results, if Ledoux certifies that the results were based on the assaying of COC samples. Ledoux will not certify anything that they have not been able to verify to be correct. On the risk of making false claims Naxos could not state different results or assert the results to be based on COC samples, if not supported by Ledoux. Ledoux has a fine reputation to uphold. They will not stand for any misrepresentation of the actual facts, they have no vested interest in the outcome. Sampling, assaying is their business. If there is ever a doubt about the veracity of their findings and the truthfulness about their operations they would be out of business in a heartbeat. JMHO Jan