Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (40413)	11/14/2012 2:56:24 PM
From: Roads End	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 222700

You are giving me a moving target GZ, you were talking about the tax on high wage earners. -g- I used to buy in on the theory tax cuts to the high income job creator would generate jobs but the evidence over the last decade hasn't validated it.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (40413)	11/14/2012 2:58:06 PM
From: Hawkmoon	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 222700

Totally concur... Business needs certainty and not to be punished for putting people back to work.. My bottom line is that it costs FAR too much to administer entitlements. I read recently that it costs $60K for every Welfare recipient (who might receive $12-20K of that).. This is ridiculous.. It would just be better to give them a job digging ditches in a national park than to pay that kind of overhead. What we need are entitlements that require recipients to perform a public service and provide some form of ROI to the taxpayers.. Hawk