Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : IVAX Insider Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 5,17,37,5,101,... who wrote (228)	12/2/1997 11:40:00 AM
From: flickerful	Respond to of 756

cute. we do think alike!

To: 5,17,37,5,101,... who wrote (228)	12/2/1997 11:43:00 AM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 756

we could probably extrapolate numbers from novartis easier than obtaining ivax projections... i will say i would like to exchange stock prices with them, for starters...

To: 5,17,37,5,101,... who wrote (228)	12/2/1997 3:18:00 PM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 756

<<In light of the FDA's decision to approve a generic version of Clozaril(R) by IVAX Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, manufacturer of Clozaril tablets, reemphasized today its commitment to the safe and effective treatment of therapy-resistant schizophrenia. >> yes, you are right: we could more easily extrapolate, assuming we could find the numbers. but, i DID like the apparent need felt by novartis to temper the ivax release with the above iteration. i find this demonstrated concern for shareholders all the more GLARING as a clear counterpoint to the ivax model...ironic, isn't it? especially, in light of the feigned ( or genuine? even more appalling...) ignorance by IR when you asked them about immunex. and STILL, not a whisper to that end, or to the prospects for paclitaxel, should they remain somehow viable. by the way, any further guidance in that regard, from your fda connection? i assume, of course, frosty, has NOT responded with the alacrity i had hoped: i give him the benefit of the doubt, FOR NOW, and fully expect a reply forthcoming, however. perhaps he is saving up for the REAL news before he replies??? it WOULD be nice.... randy ps thanks for the welcome.