SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (685157)11/16/2012 8:49:21 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580690
 
>> Petraeus was very clear today that the WH had NO ROLE nor INFLUENCE in developing the talking points...and that HE signed off on them before they went to Rice. So don't distort the facts...

I haven't listened to much news coverage of this, but my understanding was that the CIA talking points specifically reference terrorism, which was taken out of the talking points before Rice delivered them and that the CIA knew with certainty that it was a terrorist attack, NOT a riot. They did comment, however, that they didn't know "who" changed them, only that they were changed.

Since Ms. Rice was sent out as a spokesman for the WH, and Obama has said he gets the blame not her, that pretty well tells the story.

Obama lied. Not just misrepresented, but flat out lied.



To: Alighieri who wrote (685157)11/16/2012 9:03:22 PM
From: TopCat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580690
 
"Petraeus was very clear today that the WH had NO ROLE nor INFLUENCE in developing the talking points...and that HE signed off on them before they went to Rice. So don't distort the facts..."

Where the hell were you getting your news today?? He didn't "very clearly" say any such thing. He very clearly said the talking points that left the CIA (what he signed off on) INCLUDED reference to AQ and that they we deleted somewhere along the way before getting into Rice's hands.