Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (685848)	11/22/2012 2:17:55 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578048

You're a total jerk..... It is an excuse for not looking at the facts, and one that is chronically tossed about by liberals -- largely those who wouldn't know a scholarly work if it bit them on the ass. Scientific papers that are peer-reviewed will stand the test of reproducible results from other workers... Otherwise people can make off the cuff remarks like you do with no attribution and yet receive deluded acceptance by some (also of your ilk). Do you have any idea how many scientific conclusions claimed by its authors are discredited by other workers trying to repeat the same experiment or work...peer review is an important part of this process. As for knowing scholarly work, a peer review of your posts would expose you as a fake.... I doubt that you heard about it but about 20 years ago, a guy published experimental results that he said showed he achieved room temperature nuclear fusion....he didn't have prior peer review but you can bet your ass he got plenty of it after the fact....btw, no one ever successfully reproduced the results he claimed....but he did get his 15 minutes.. Imo, the opinion you have of yourself is way above your pay grade...(peer review not required).