Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (686543)	11/30/2012 12:57:48 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583804

CJ, It relates because dividends are income also. A dividend is NOT another of income. It is the share of the income from a corporation which the shareholder is entitled to. One income, one tax. Tenchusatsu

To: combjelly who wrote (686543)	11/30/2012 6:43:31 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583804

>> Why? It is income. It is previously taxed income. >> That is done in many places in the tax code. Like where? I would argue, correctly, that the tax code takes extraordinary steps to prevent precisely these situations -- in both directions. Taxpayers regularly get adjustments to basis whenever they spend [additional] money on an investment, the entire point of which is to avoid double taxation. Code section 706(b) deals extensively with adjustments to partners' capital accounts, both to prevent double taxation and deductions of losses in excess of basis. Subchapter S, in code sections 1301, et.seq., presents the "Accumulated Adjustments Account" -- a tax only phenomenon -- to track shareholder's basis in the pass-through entity. Several sections dealing with capital assets, including but not limited to 1231, 1245 and 1250 take substantial measures to insure that just the correct amount of capital gain (not too much, not too little) is recognized on the disposition of depreciable property. And of course, even IRAs have a meticulously kept basis, the point of which is to provide that every bit of money earned is taxed while none of it is taxed twice. I would hesitate to say there is NO other provision where double taxation is supported, but I don't think it is correct to characterize it as "many". Perhaps you had some examples in mind?