Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : "I STILL own the ban button, buddy" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (848)	12/1/2012 8:46:41 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2133

"It was a good article." We already know that you consider anything that slanders God or Jesus or any Christian to be wonderful and true no matter how inaccurate, illogical or unfair. That piece of Homosexual propaganda trash was ignorant of history and completely lacking in any evidence to back up it's slanderous allegations. Now: that you would find that kind of slander without evidence compelling says far more about you than it ever could about Jesus. "It wasn't a glaring error at all!" Sure it is. If he doesn't know the first thing about basic Church history that is easily documented why should we believe his wild and slanderous fantasies that are based only on feelings and anachronism? "It was in no way central to the point he was writing about." It speaks directly to his and your lack of credibility. You are clutching at straws and simply posting whatever crap shows up in your "gay Jesus" google searches because you are unable to back up your big mouth about how "hundreds of Churches, believe that Jesus was gay". It was exactly the same thing when you claimed that "god commanded rape in the bible" you couldn't, so you simply stared throwing shit at the wall and prayed that something would stick. So far nothing has stuck, but you still have shit all over yourself.