Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (26353)	12/2/1997 4:03:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572807

You wrote: "If you extended your reasoning, the K5 and cyrix chips with their PR rating worked harder than the K6, Wonder why AMD decided to go for the higher clock speed tradeoff." I pointed out that your conclusion wouldn't necessarily follow. But it wouldn't surprise me if, were you able to overclock a K5 to 233 mhz, it would perform similarly to a K6 233. Both chips outperform a Pentium at a given clock speed. The reason there's no K5 anymore? 1) Much larger die size. 2) No MMX. 3) Higher power consumption. 4) AMD had difficulty trying to get it running at higher clock speeds. So the higher clock speed tradeoff made sense for AMD, given its options. Cyrix took the other tack and still uses a PRII rating. Kevin