To: Fiscally Conservative who wrote (13413 ) 12/3/2012 5:29:38 AM From: John Pitera 3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421 Thank you, the 1982 to 2000 secular bull market was based on a 60% P/E ratio Multiple Expansion, 20% on inflation and 20% on organic growth, as commented on Bloomberg this past few weeks. We had FED Funds rates of 19% at 2 different times in 1980, and Long Bond yields over 16%. Inflation was a huge concern at the time. Part of our problem is that we are living in times when interest rates and inflation will trend higher as we work our way through the second decade of this century. If the governments start to cut back on spending we go into negative GDP, declining earnings, higher unemployment, less consumer confidence and and more deleveraging. The Central Banks of the world have Created Trillions of dollars, YEN, Euro's.......Yuan Brazilian Reals. Money Market yields are at 2/100 of 1 percent. 2 basis points. Dividend stocks paying 4% are from one perspective "a no brainer" The problem is that one has to use the economics axiom, if all other things remain constant The real world is such a complex multivariable model that is fundamentally based on perception, confidence in the system, mass psychology remaining stable, Mass Psychology which drives just about all group behavior is a pendulum that swings back and forth between fear and greed. John Mauldin's book "endgame" has one chapter where the author takes out lengthy direct quotes out of a BIS Bank of International Settlements paper and adds some bold faced editorial analysis. The report uses very terse terms such as devastating consequences of the Major countries not dealiing with the mounting structural deficits that compounds on itself and is in addition to the cyclical deficits that do not seem to ever stop these days. the decenial pattern says that 2013 will be a down year here's the feedback from the MTA In his book Tides and the Affairs of Men (1939), Edgar Lawrence Smith presented the notion of a ten-year stock market cycle. Smith's theory resulted from combining two other theories, Wesley Mitchell's 40-month cycle theory and the theory of seasonality. Combining these two periods, Smith theorized that there must be a ten-year, or 120-month, cycle. This would result from ten 12-month, annual cycles and three 40-month cycles coinciding every 10 years. When Smith investigated prices more closely, he found that indeed there appeared to be a price pattern in the stock market that had similar characteristics every ten years. This pattern has since been called the "decennial pattern." The decennial pattern theory states that years ending in 3, 7, and 10 (and sometimes 6) are often down years. Years ending in 5, 8 and most of 9 are advancing years. Smith did not follow the normal calendar year beginning in January but found that counting the beginning of a year in October was more reliable. he also hypothesized that occasionally a nine-year or 11-year cycle overlaid the decennial cycle. He attempted to find the reason behind the decennial pattern and looked at sunspots and solar radiation, average rainfall, barometric pressure, and other weather-causing conditions, believing that weather patterns were the most likely cause of change in human psychology . It was then well accepted that weather had an affect on health and disease, and thus on optimism and pessimism, and observation first mentioned by Hippocrates. The decennial pattern continues to have an excellent history. For example, the fifth-year advance has been observed well over 100 years never to have failed 12 out of 12 times1 . One problem with the theory is that a large enough sample is not possible yet, and that such projections could be the result of chance. It is something to keep in the back of an investor's mind but not something to use alone to commit funds to the stock market. knowledgebase.mta.org a declining market in 2013 and possibly into 2014 would set up a nice springboard for 2015. The single most important single input in financial markets and human psychology is time. WD Gann always stated that time is the most important element in how markets function. An upcoming significant decline in equity and risk assets would be the third leg of the Nasdaq 89% declne bear markets of 2000-2002 and the Great Financial Collapse and wipe out from 2007-2009. One more signficant painful decline will have peoplle loathing equities as an asset class...... probably create political changes .... potentially a new political party that may coalesce from the wealth destruction and then hopefully the phoneix rises out of the ashes, we become an energy independant country and a exporter of energy, nanotechnology, educational, medical and yet unfortold advances by 2020. Gann was also a believe in a 100 year cycle so we may have to endure some type of warfare event to play as an analogue to WWI and Height of Napoleans power iin the years before the historic battle of waterloo. Where the arch duke of Wellington bested him and is sometimes reported to have served as a huge accelerator of the House of Rothschild's wealth as they bought heavily into a British Consul and Equity collapse in the panic that Napolean may have actually been the victor and was on his way to London. That's talk for another day.. speaking of education....http://www.khanacademy.org/ learn almost anything for free is their motto. This totally free online site is a possible tipping point for how education can be delievered. That coupled with MIT-Harvard and Berkeley's forray into offering some free online courses, on a pilot project basis earlier this year. and to close on a light sports note ... Houston Texans 11-1. When Charles Krauthammer mentioned them as a Super Bowl winner Fox's panel host Chris Mathews asked the 4 panelists at the start of the 2011 season, Mathews actually said "What " and then started laughing as he thought Krauthammer was joking or had just dropped in from outer space. Best Regards, John