Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bart13 who wrote (96895)	12/2/2012 9:39:27 PM
From: Robin Plunder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219928

"and Rand probably said that too in her ever-so-coquettish way." the problem with coquettes is that they are focussed on what other folks are thinking of them, rather than on the facts of the matter....many a beautiful mind has been lost for this reason... rp

To: bart13 who wrote (96895)	12/3/2012 8:04:26 AM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219928

Bart says;" And there are no perfect identities in the material universe" This is correct. Below is the paragraph which contains why he's correct. All the talk about ARand is just an allowance made by the elements governing compartments, AR is more about containing via substitution, the transition of awareness from the classical to the Quantum Mechanical....many on this thread have an emerging clue about this important transition, they have begun to understand Systemics, hierarchies, news production. Accordingly under the terms for RO/RS=CF goals for information exchanges must be managed according to the classical views....Rand is offered up as a Variable when it is anything but. Rand is not Quantum and thus has become for some just another directed line of output, into a vast stream of alternatives. Look, if F. A. von Hayek's Everettian notion, the “time-shapes of total capital stock”, is correct -- and it almost certainly is from all but the most myopic of Newtonian perspectives -- then there also are the time-shapes of total supersystem-system-subsystem risk and exchange-value over total capital stock. Description of each and all of these would require a linear-time independent (and “transcendental” in the N. H. Abel sense) quantum wave equation -- and domain decomposition of the supersystem-system-subsystem composite would require topologically active quantal operator-time as fundamental enabler of the quantum potential in the relative-state of the time-shapes of total capital stock. Von Hayek time-shapes here replace the idea of multiple universes falsely attributed to Hugh Everett's paradigm-bursting notion, “relative-state”. This means there are different “phases” (e.g., in simile to solid, liquid, gas, supersolid, superconductor, et cetera) of capital, risk, and exchange-value, that these three -- like massenergy -- cannot actually be created or destroyed, only undergo phase changes or be transferred through supersystem-system-subsystem composite by topological operations of temporal curl. Derivatives (a subliminal projective-identification parody of fiber-bundle arithmetics and a regressed inversion of the domain decomposition methods in numerical analysis, i.e., calculus), for instance, not only concentrate and transfer risk from subsystem to system to supersystem, they do so by changing the phase of exchange-value from, say, “solid” to “liquid” (which change is presently viewed by economists working exclusively with passive, referential linear-time as “creation of liquidity”). But the volume and supersystemic concentration of derivative liquidity is not the only thing about derivatives bound to drown central bank initiatives at exchange-value phase change (e.g., “printing” of fiat money); there is also the base-state “holding time” factor and the velocity, acceleration, and time rate of change of acceleration of the liquidity “created” by phase-change operations (enabled by 3-fold temporal curl's topological transforms over von Hayek total capital stock on a Lukasiewiczian m-logically-valued referencing Hilbert space). Liquidity is presently looked at primarily in terms of types and volumes, the dynamical aspects being very much relatively neglected. Even in a 1T2-valued logical framework (as is our current nonsystem monetary system -- no authentic supersystem-system-subsystem composite) there are at least Cartesian vertical and horizontal boundary value problems, transfer rates, rates of such rates, and rates of rates of such rates relatively neglected, these nested rates determining various topological properties of the composite.

To: bart13 who wrote (96895)	12/3/2012 10:28:57 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 219928

Quite right about identities < It'll never happen. I'm a trader way more than an investor. And there are no perfect identities in the material universe..> Just yesterday after another minor blunder I decided I should slow down and make every action a perfect action. But when organizing a mental process to create that perfect identity for each outcome, I rapidly ran into an insurmountable problem. I would have to move infinitely slowly to cover all possibilities, which means that before my decision making was complete about my next minuscule move, the Cosmos would have rendered me irrelevant and recycled into nano particles. So I have decided to continue without perfection, but perhaps a closer approximation to it, without grinding to a halt. In the same way, your 'trader' identity is probably so approximate that your imperfect trader identity might overlap with my oil = gold theory, which itself is not a totally perfect correlation, as laboriously explained some time ago, but near enough for government work and hauling rocks across Outback Oz. Meanwhile, my accuracy of 4 significant figures for the price of gold for the last 4 years is probabilistically impossible [or very unlikely at the very best] but nevertheless true [near enough - with only 3 weeks to go]. The way I calculated my gold price predictions was by buying petrol for my car, [among other things], on the basis that petrol = oil = gold. Mqurice