SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36006)12/3/2012 3:36:19 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 86356
 
they also had the piltdown man, global cooling during the 60s and 70s, believed in eugenics, said newton was the limit



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36006)12/3/2012 3:43:57 PM
From: Hawkmoon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 86356
 
So you're saying that that self-proclaimed "mainstream climate scientists" are responsible for splitting "the atom, sequenced DNA, put spider genes in goats, developed AIDs drugs, invented Viagra, and sent a probe out of the solar system."

Why.. that's quite an accomplishment!!

On the other hand.. REAL people who actually participated in the splitting of the atom, namely Teller, were so outraged about the exaggerated claims by the climate science community that they signed the Oregon Petition.. (along with 9000 other various Phds)..

petitionproject.org

Hell, the IPCC is so "mainstream" that it's chairman has no credentials in climate science at all..

en.wikipedia.org

And he likes to write soft-porn novels as a side hobby.. (along with making stupid, UNSUBSTANTIATED, claims that all the Glaciers in the Himalayas will have melted within 35 years)..

Your idea of "mainstream" climate scientists are those who seem hell bent upon stifling any questioning of their climate models and scientific methodology. We saw it with the Climategate scandal, and we see it with the folks like Skeptical Science.. (the founder of which is a self-employed cartoonist, albeit with some background in physics).

populartechnology.net

Read what was discovered among their private emails when their site got hacked.. They are trying to "drown out" any dissent..

populartechnology.net

Real Mainstream science INVITES having their results challenged. They don't censor scientific dissent, or try to hide raw data that their models are based upon.

Hawk



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36006)12/3/2012 3:56:06 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
The folks pushing AGW didn't do any of those things. They have made a bunch of failed predictions though.