SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36009)12/3/2012 4:01:25 PM
From: Hawkmoon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 86356
 
Don't link to the "scientific method" when you are defending people who have violated it over and over again, attempting to censor their raw data from scrutiny, manipulate their results by cherry picking data proxies, or to attempt to stifle critical review of their model and conclusions BY ALL challengers.

Scientific inquiry is generally intended to be as objective as possible in order to reduce biased interpretations of results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, giving them the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of these data to be established (when data is sampled or compared to chance).

You don't censor dissent, or hide your raw data. You share it widely, with complete transparency so that your results can be confirmed, or refuted..

Hawk