SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (687032)12/3/2012 5:56:41 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584437
 
>> I know that people with pre-existing conditions will get insurance,

Well, this is a plus.

>> that young adults are covered on their parents' policy til 26

I'm not sure this is really a positive at all. Kids who are 26 could buy their own insurance; both of mine did, and it was dirt cheap -- in fact, my 29 year old son still pays only $100/month. What a bargain.

I don't see much value in training kids that someone will take care of them forever.

>> that almost all Americans will be able to get insurance and hopefully get preventive medicine measures.

Almost all Americans could already get insurance. If they wanted it. The primary differences are that now they've given up their basic right NOT to have insurance if they so choose, and many of those who DID have insurance will not any longer. In addition, they won't have jobs, since Obamacare is a huge job killer, particularly for young adults who were to pay for this nonsense.

>> Thank God for the Dems.......just like they gave us SS,Medicare,Medicaid........

Do you have any idea how fucking stupid this remark is? These programs -- these three you mentioned -- have sucked the future standards of living away from our kids and their as-yet unborn grandkids.

How you can sleep at night knowing this is beyond me.

It is the most immoral action any nation ever took against its children short of just killing them; in many cases, it will end up giving them lives that make the Dust Bowl look like Disneyland. That's no way to live, and YOU did it to them.



To: puborectalis who wrote (687032)12/3/2012 6:10:03 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 1584437
 
Can a liberal say this guy is wrong about human nature? And if so, why?


20 Observations About Human Nature That Liberals Would Probably Disagree With
December 1, 2012

townhall.com

By John Hawkins

1) Working hard, being self-reliant and taking responsibility for your own life are good for you and will make you much happier than having too much leisure time, being overly dependent and giving others responsibility for your life.

2) The more a behavior is rewarded with attention, fame, sympathy or money, the more of it we'll see. We recognize this almost instinctively when it comes to good behaviors, but we also tend to almost habitually block it out when it comes to behaviors we don't want to encourage.

3) There's nothing shameful about being poor -- but, if you stay poor over the long haul in a country like America, you're doing something wrong.

4) Oftentimes, the line between bully and victim is very thin indeed. As a matter of fact, the most vicious, nasty and sadistic people you are likely to ever run into will probably view themselves as victims or advocates on behalf of those they believe have been victimized.

5) Human beings are born as selfish, savage, feral little beasts not much different from wolves or tigers. The reason they don't remain that way is because of the conditioning they learn from their parents, their friends, their church, their entertainment, their teachers and other factors. The worse we become at transmitting important values to children, the more degenerate, sinful and crime-ridden our society will become.

6) The less responsible people become for their own lives, the weaker, more dependent and generally less effective they become as human beings.

7) With rare exceptions, individuals are better able to determine and act in their own interest than any government agency ever could.

8) If you think the most immoral thing someone can do is say, "That's immoral," you're helping to ruin the world.

9) Almost no one is as careful about spending other people's money wisely as he is about making sure his own money is well spent.

10) Diversity usually proves to be a weakness, not a strength -- although intellectual diversity does at least have the benefit of undermining groupthink.

11) You can believe in tolerance, diversity, and "not being mean" all the way down to your soul and still be completely and utterly amoral. Real morality is difficult & requires firm lines.

12) A moral code that's applied to only one gender, one race, or one ideology, but not to others is amoral tribalism, not morality.

13) The high standards and strict moral codes of Christianity aren't there to keep people from having fun; they're in place to keep them from doing things that seem like fun at first, but help to ruin their lives over the long haul.

14) People care more about themselves, their families and their friends than they do about everyone else. Anything that relies on the average person caring about someone he's never met as much as he does his own family is doomed to failure before it starts.

15) Morals are often a package deal. When you undercut moral standards in one area, it often leads to a degradation of morals across the board.

16) Once you start catering to people's pathologies, it seldom ends well or at a reasonable point.

17) Evil usually doesn't think it's evil. Additionally, it usually has many apologists and its supporters typically portray it as good.

18) Most of the serious problems people have in their lives are caused by the people they look at in the mirror every morning as opposed to bad luck, rich people or society.

19) Greed isn't about wanting to keep what you've earned; it's about wanting goods, products or services that you aren't paying for or haven't earned.

20) Anyone trying to help other human beings through a government program or charity has to take into account the fact that most people being helped will take as much as possible while doing as little as possible for it.
ht goldworldnet on PfC



To: puborectalis who wrote (687032)12/3/2012 6:11:12 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584437
 
I'll bet you we have more people without health insurance AFTER Obamacare is fully in place.

People will find it's cheaper to do without and pay the fine.



To: puborectalis who wrote (687032)12/3/2012 6:53:01 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584437
 
While there has been a lot of bluster from the G.O.P. about how we should reduce the deficit with spending cuts, not tax increases, no leading figures on the Republican side have been able or willing to specify what, exactly, they want to cut.

And there’s a reason for this reticence. The fact is that Republican posturing on the deficit has always been a con game, a play on the innumeracy of voters and reporters. Now Mr. Obama has demanded that the G.O.P. put up or shut up — and the response is an aggrieved mumble.

nytimes.com