To: Spekulatius who wrote (13239 ) 12/4/2012 1:31:30 AM From: Paul Senior Respond to of 34328 Petrobakken: "Petrobakken, with their high debt load and heavy investment in new fields, cannot really afford the high dividend they're paying, imo." Perhaps you are correct. The dividend (.08 monthly since 10/'09) does seem sustainable to me though, from what I see and from my understanding of it. "Our monthly dividend of $0.08 per share has remained constant since the Company's inception. During the third quarter, total dividends of $45 million were declared. The dividend represented 37% of funds flow from operations for the quarter; however participation in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan is at 62%, resulting in cash dividends of approximately $17 million, or 14% of quarterly funds flow from operations. As at September 30, 2012, PetroBakken had $0.4 billion of debt drawn on our $1.4 billion credit facility. We currently have $1.0 billion of available credit and a debt capital structure with diversified sources of credit and a layered maturity profile that compliments the long term nature of our light oil-focused assets. We remained active with our Normal Course Issuer Bid, purchasing approximately 493,000 shares in the third quarter at a total cost of $6.4 million ($13.09/share). Year-to-date, we have purchased approximately 3.8 million shares at a total cost of $51.7 million ($13.51/share)." In my view, PBKEF/PBN.to is big enough and doing enough -- acquiring properties, aggressively exploring, buying back shares, having a very attractive dividend yield -- to where I want to continue to add shares if/as stock continues to fall on no adverse news. Jmo opinion of course, and my intentions.