Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Schnullie who wrote (111634)	12/4/2012 7:22:50 PM
From: Sam	Respond to of 118717

For the record, I don't mind critical posts at all.

To: Schnullie who wrote (111634)	12/5/2012 2:10:10 AM
From: Robohogs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 118717

Wrong factors challenged though. To me the key is the balance sheet mismanagement, or at least my view of such. One can also challenge the acquisitions and aggressiveness of such. I do have a problem challenging a partner's delays, however. Meanwhile, most of the pain here is sector-based, not individual. GDP is down 65% over last 3 years, FST 70%, SD 35%, ATPG 100%, all while MHR has more than doubled. Yes, MHR has halved over last 18 months though. But so has SD and the others. I have read that 80 to 90% of a stock's move is related to the market or sector, and only the rest is individual. Place blame where it rests. The sector and its treatment by the Street. And yes, I do think GE has mismanaged the BS and too many acquisitions, positions I have stated here before, critically. Jon