Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (687188)	12/5/2012 1:58:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583507

Al, That's right ten...that's what's important...Al won't give Ten his view of what we should spend...not that we spend more than the next 20 countries combined and our culture has come to where questioning these expenditures gets a politician burnt at the stake thanks to republicans (again) ... OK Al, so which is it? Should we spend no more on defense than the #2 spender on defense, which is currently China? Should we spend no more on defense than the next 20 countries combined? Or should we stop with your childish, idiotic comparisons and just spend according to what WE need for defense? Not what China needs, not what the next 20 countries need, but what WE need. You haven't given a straight answer to any of my questions, so it's obvious you think none of them are worth answering, yet you can't resist responding to my posts. It seems like the only thing you hope to accomplish is silencing the opposition, which of course is Tenchu's 2nd rule of partisan politics. ;-) Tenchusatsu