Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (36104)	12/5/2012 12:25:46 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 86356

The modelers said 15 years was significant so we should take them at their word.

To: Land Shark who wrote (36104)	12/5/2012 9:45:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

Models were INCOMPLETE and can't account for ALL SHORT TERM variations. Yet, you want me to only look at the ice mass data for the Antarctic for the past 10 years, despite the possibility that it might be a, your words, "short term" variation? Just accept that the verdict is still out on global warming, it's causes, and whether there even exists a "tipping point".. Stop this insane assertion that it's "case closed" on AGW.. It clearly is not, and more research is needed before such rash conclusions are reached.. Hawk