Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (36174)	12/6/2012 9:56:38 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

Thomas Chivers lolol are you kidding me ? he's a lefty loon journalist, never taken a science course in his life, pure propagandist

To: Land Shark who wrote (36174)	12/7/2012 6:58:08 PM
From: Bilow	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

Hi Land Shark Re: " As always, no. As always,..." The basic problem is that your "As always, no" is a link to you tube. If you want to show something, give a link to the peer reviewed literature. The Svensmark theory was not disproved by the Cloud experiment and continues as a viable explanation for recent warming. Here's a peer reviewed article from the past year: GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 38, L09805, doi:10.1029/2011GL047036, 2011 ... Further we conclude that under the present experimental conditions (P = 1 atmosphere, T = 21.2°C, [SO 2 ] = 2ppb) there is a clear evidence of ion - induced nucleation as a source of aerosol production, which corroborates earlier measurements using only gamma radiation as the ionizing source [Svensmark et al., 2007; Enghoff et al., 2008]." www.leif.org/EOS/2011GL047036.pdf Research isn't over, but it's going the way Svensmark said it would. This is not good news for your side. -- Carl