SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36265)12/7/2012 12:54:10 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 86356
 
Everytime you lose a point, you start with the well, you're too stupid to understand it thing. Easier on your ego isn't it?



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36265)12/8/2012 12:02:32 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86356
 
Wharfie, what you seem not to understand is that parliament establishing something doesn't necessarily mean it's accepted or true. Sir Lord Viscount apparently disputes some naming standard, perhaps because he thinks his common law rights were abused, or they are trying to do so. I have no idea and neither do I care a whit.

The topic is politics, energy, CO2 and CO2 is Sir Lord Viscount's subject. His name will not have an effect on CO2 levels or temperatures, but it does seem to get your hot air going. Then, as usual, you revert to insults and denigration as though you thereby have an argument whereas it simply demonstrates yet again the Global Doomster Alarmists have such a pathetic case that they have to ignore the subject and attack the person.

Since the situation is a matter of whether the falsehoods about CO2 are accepted or not, and you do not have a winning political position - CO2 being studiously ignored in the presidential contest because it is recognized as an irrelevancy - you are merely demonstrating increasingly to people wondering that the Alarmists don't have a leg to stand on and mainly are seeking opm; CO2 Alarmists are basically rent seekers.

Mqurice



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36265)12/8/2012 12:02:42 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 86356