Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (36472)	12/11/2012 2:11:16 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

" this is typical of the scientific ignorance displayed by even those who claim to be peer reviewed climate experts....or is it just deliberate in defence of alterior motives? No; it's just you. You prolly need to go back to square 1, third grade science, and pay attention this time. "you claim climactic events like midiveal warming or maunder minimum are regional in scope, and on the other, you claim temperatures from around the world can be averaged", which is exactly how they know that your events were confined to regions (proxy temps, of course, since weather stations didn't exist everywhere back then).Those averages show that temperatures were not changing uniformly, nor in the same direction, thruout the entire planet over that period of time. Now however, all stations, whether arctic, desert, tropical, ocean, (lakes, too when studied), northern hemisphere, southern hemisphere have been trending in the same direction for decades. Also, the middle and deep oceans and the troposphere. sciencedaily.com