Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tradesman who wrote (2428)	12/2/1997 8:18:00 PM
From: Carole	Respond to of 11708

Tradesman, I agree with you with regard to some personality types.. some posts are inane, possibly mine sometimes especially when it's very early or very late and it's "chat" time. But some of this stuff... JEEZ! I had hoped this board wouldn't come down to that level ( as I have seen on other boards ). I liked it better when we all felt part of a family of sorts. The one post that really set me off was the guy that called this a "scam". I ask him to prove that in one single post that we can understand and be done with it. I don't know a lot about drilling, but some are duds and some are bonanzas. We will have to wait for the outcome. The only major concern I have at this point is What the Hell are we going to do about the shorters??? H. K., Mike, somebody, please... what is the plan? Oh yeah, keep on posting Tradesman.. c

To: tradesman who wrote (2428)	12/2/1997 8:31:00 PM
From: David Smith	Respond to of 11708

Tradesman says: Whatdaya say guys, if there's real substance to the future of CSMA and inside knowledge, lay it on the table. There is nothing wrong with a conversation with someone that has an opposing view. You wound up turning people off with certain statements you made. You made it very black and white when you talked about M3 and Coconino. Surely you don't believe that it's a 100% one-sided deal, do you? I think you would prefer not to receive the information second hand. Why don't you call one of the company's representatives up and discuss whatever concerns you have about the company. The phone numbers are posted in Franco's opening thread. Let us know how it goes. I understand that Mike Millis has over 200 phone messages because he was out for the meeting so you might want to wait a few days. I would rather not get into a debate with you, I'm too drained from everything I am trying to accomplish right now. You really don't see any real substance in any of the 4 subsidiary companies? How can that be? David Smith P.S. What companies do you feel are better investments? I won't debate your responses, I promise, I am just curious.

To: tradesman who wrote (2428)	12/2/1997 9:34:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 11708

You could read through the press releases and the 2400+ prior posts, but to sum up 1. EnviroTec well, if Class V is approved, will generate significant revenues. While not a fait accomplit, its approval probability is higher than either 3 or 4 D seismic. 2. Ad Hatters has revenues, is growing, and was the glue that kept the Company going. A BB stock with revenues, that's significant in itself. 3. LPS, a buy whose intent was to establish asset requirements for NASDAQ listing, is actually expected to be profitable by the end of the year. 4. Coconino Oil and Gas was not factored into my criteria for buying. So I viewed yesterday's news as a windfall. Now, other than seeing the Receivables flow by, isn't the above enough to have warranted a buy? I assume you thought there was real substance or you wouldn't have gone long in the first place. TraderGreg