SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36588)12/13/2012 2:08:38 PM
From: Land Shark  Respond to of 86356
 
I don't advocate hydropower either. It's environmentally damaging, but saying it being responsible for 1/3 of the annual CO2 emissions is a gross exaggeration at best. These guys paint anything that threatens the burning of hydrocarbons as being "bad".



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (36588)12/13/2012 6:20:55 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
Anti fossil fuel, anti nuke, anti hydro. Anti anything that would actually work on an industrial scale. If we eliminated everything else, greens will turn against solar and wind too*. There is no energy source without an environmental impact.

* As it is, liberals have already objected to and blocked solar and wind projects in some places.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News