Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (211741)	12/16/2012 11:25:27 AM
From: neolib	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541117

Its the jurors who are requested to leave their firearms behind. The criminals are already in police custody in a courtroom. If owning and caring firearms is deemed useful for protection, then why shouldn't they be carried into a courtroom by jurors? Most the argument after one of these disasters is whether more guns or less guns will make things better. The NRA thinks more is better everywhere. For some reason, we have collectively decided that that logic breaks down in certain situations (as you are saying). Like on airplanes. Its a bit funny to see the great inconvenience, expense and hassle America goes through at airports while trumpeting the 2'nd Amendment as a pillar of our freedom. LOL funny actually. Idiot Nation....