Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Conservatives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (1879)	12/17/2012 1:23:04 PM
From: J.B.C.	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 125414

OK, let's pretend you get your way and a 6 round clip is approved. How long to change a clip....? Less than two full seconds. I have 10 clips on me so I'm delayed at most 20 seconds for 60 rounds.

To: bentway who wrote (1879)	12/17/2012 1:54:46 PM
From: Honey_Bee	9 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 125414

Did you miss my point? You have NO RIGHT to "infringe" on my Second Amendment rights. I am a law-abiding citizen -- always have been.

To: bentway who wrote (1879)	12/17/2012 4:52:55 PM
From: ManyMoose	1 Recommendation Respond to of 125414

The thing you don't seem to understand is that it's not the 'clip' (as you incorrectly call it) that we are defending, it's the Second Amendment. It says: the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Limiting magazine capacity is an infringement. That's the whole point. You should be concerned about this too, because every little chip taken out of your freedom weakens and diminishes it. For what it's worth, I prefer revolvers because magazines are too hard to load. Especially the high capacity ones.